These are not ...Proof..coins.These 1965 coins are hard to come by in the SMS set in decent condition of the higher grades as 67 or 68 with a cam or DCam designation.They were not struck as a Proof coins...
These are not ...Proof..coins.These 1965 coins are hard to come by in the SMS set in decent condition of the higher grades as 67 or 68 with a cam or DCam designation.They were not struck as a Proof coins... >>
I don't think that pq means proof...
If I was half as smart as I am dumb Iwould be a genious
These are not ...Proof..coins.These 1965 coins are hard to come by in the SMS set in decent condition of the higher grades as 67 or 68 with a cam or DCam designation.They were not struck as a Proof coins... >>
Stephunter is correct in his assessment of that coin. He's also an expert on these.
I took ..pq.. as to what it meant as ..Proof Quality..and more likely these coins are becoming harder to find.It may be stupid money but collectors are shelling out bigger bucks for far lesser desired coins...
<< <i>It may be stupid money but collectors are shelling out bigger bucks for far lesser desired coins... >>
Ultimately, stupid money is borne out as exactly what it is. And someone else who was smarter or luckier will have the money, and the stupid person who used to have it will instead have something worth about a tenth what he paid for it.
Me at the Springfield coin show: 60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
Gemineye
Posts: 5,374 ✭
Comments
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Wow. Bought an 65 and 67 SMS MS67CAM a couple of months ago for about $430 on the BST board. Starting to look like I made a good decision. >>
Only if that Heritage buyer and bidders are bidding again.
There's lots of silly money laying around out there which does not necessarily indicate a price increase.
Look at this. (PCGS Price guide = $295)
and this. (PCGS Price guide = $315)
The buyer did not get a bargain on either one of these.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>These coins keep going higher and higher....for a decent grade...
Heritage Link >>
Doesn't look like a pq coin either.
<< <i>
Doesn't look like a pq coin either. >>
These are not ...Proof..coins.These 1965 coins are hard to come by in the SMS set in decent condition of the higher grades as 67 or 68 with a cam or DCam designation.They were not struck as a Proof coins...
<< <i>
<< <i>
Doesn't look like a pq coin either. >>
These are not ...Proof..coins.These 1965 coins are hard to come by in the SMS set in decent condition of the higher grades as 67 or 68 with a cam or DCam designation.They were not struck as a Proof coins... >>
I don't think that pq means proof...
<< <i><<
Doesn't look like a pq coin either. >>
These are not ...Proof..coins.These 1965 coins are hard to come by in the SMS set in decent condition of the higher grades as 67 or 68 with a cam or DCam designation.They were not struck as a Proof coins... >>
Stephunter is correct in his assessment of that coin. He's also an expert on these.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>That's stupid money for that coin. >>
I agree it is more than double of what I paid for mine and I got it from another expert in this series.
<< <i>I took ..pq.. as to what it meant as ..Proof Quality >>
Premium Quality.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>It may be stupid money but collectors are shelling out bigger bucks for far lesser desired coins... >>
Ultimately, stupid money is borne out as exactly what it is. And someone else who was smarter or luckier will have the money, and the stupid person who used to have it will instead have something worth about a tenth what he paid for it.
60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
<< <i>
<< <i>I took ..pq.. as to what it meant as ..Proof Quality >>
Premium Quality.
Russ, NCNE >>
My err.....