Home PSA Set Registry Forum

PSA 10 (oc) ??????

Can PSA 10's have qualifiers? I never thought so until I saw this on ebay! Here is the link.

http://orderdetails.com/foresale/home/04132341pmutzuHw21.jpg
BrentR

1984 Donruss Basic/Master #1 100% 2008 Modern Set Award
Cal Ripken Jr. Rookie Set 100%
Ken Griffey Jr. Rookie Set #1T All 10-100%
Randy Johnson Rookie Set #1T All 10-100%
Frank Thomas Rookie Set #1T All 10-100%
Sammy Sosa Rookie Set #1T All 10-100%
Jeff Bagwell Rookie Set #1 100%
1993 Finest Promos #1T 100%

Comments

  • ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,245 ✭✭
    Holy mackerol...at first I thought it was photoshopped, but look.....

    According to the PSA Certification Database, certification number 04453719 is defined as the following:

    ITEM INFORMATION
    Year: 1993
    Brand: FINEST
    Player: BO JACKSON
    Variety: N/A
    Grade: 10OC

    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • shagrotn77shagrotn77 Posts: 5,581 ✭✭✭✭
    Has to be a labeling error. Probably should have been 9 OC. Still, that's an extremely poor example of quality control.
    "My father would womanize, he would drink. He would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark. Sometimes he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy. The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament. Our childhood was typical. Summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring we'd make meat helmets. When we were insolent we were placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds - pretty standard really."
  • I agree "Mechanical Error" that they have to address quickly.
  • I think the labeling error lies in the OC, not the Gem Mint 10 portion.

    NathanSr
    Successful purchases: Lawnmowerman(2), Wabittwax, mkg809, thePlasticman

    Successful sales: xphunk, vjsteele4, onefasttalon, five7teen, yankeeno7

    Successful trades: mijang

    Generous Souls: MBMiler25, DES1984
  • good point, still needs fixing pronto
  • envoy98envoy98 Posts: 4,000 ✭✭
    Stellar QC.

    The data entry person had to get it wrong, the person printing the label got it wrong. Data entry to the cert database got it wrong and the guy doing the encasing got it wrong.

    Ugh.
  • Other than that, just about everyone caught it. lol
    BrentR

    1984 Donruss Basic/Master #1 100% 2008 Modern Set Award
    Cal Ripken Jr. Rookie Set 100%
    Ken Griffey Jr. Rookie Set #1T All 10-100%
    Randy Johnson Rookie Set #1T All 10-100%
    Frank Thomas Rookie Set #1T All 10-100%
    Sammy Sosa Rookie Set #1T All 10-100%
    Jeff Bagwell Rookie Set #1 100%
    1993 Finest Promos #1T 100%
  • baseballfanbaseballfan Posts: 5,456 ✭✭✭
    "I think the labeling error lies in the OC, not the Gem Mint 10 portion."



    i agree it looks pretty good to me
    Fred

    collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.

    looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started

  • DavidPuddyDavidPuddy Posts: 3,484 ✭✭✭
    WOW! That's bad.
    I wonder how many times that's happened?
    It may be a 1/1.
    "The Sipe market is ridiculous right now"
    CDsNuts, 1/9/15
  • carew4mecarew4me Posts: 3,470 ✭✭✭✭
    Could go for "Giant Cheeto" money

    Loves me some shiny!
  • MorrellManMorrellMan Posts: 3,238 ✭✭✭
    image
    Mark (amerbbcards)


    "All evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Seller ended auction early.

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • TabeTabe Posts: 6,060 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Stellar QC.

    The data entry person had to get it wrong, the person printing the label got it wrong. Data entry to the cert database got it wrong and the guy doing the encasing got it wrong.

    Ugh. >>


    One would think PSA's software wouldn't allow them to create grade combinations that can't exist - like 10(OC). But hey, what do I know, I'm just a software QA guy.

    Tabe
  • bluemarlinbluemarlin Posts: 627 ✭✭✭
    Wow,Never thought I would see that happening.

    Jake
  • Now that is truely a 1/1.

    The first ever Gem Mint 10 o/c
  • What's next 10.5?
    succesful deals :richtree, Bosox1976, Bkritz, mknez, SOM, cardcounter2, ddfamf, cougar701, mrG, Griffins : thanks All

    Go Phillies
Sign In or Register to comment.