Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

Guess the grade: 1971 Topps Blyleven: RESULTS.. PSA says Min Size

The card is a little short l/r, and seems to be a little wider at one end than at the other. Is this clear trimming, or are there printing issues with 71 Topps that this would fall under?

imageimage
My Giants collection want list

WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25

Comments

  • Options
    jimq112jimq112 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭
    Looks like a diamond cut and somebody straightened one edge out. I don't think it gets graded, probably a miscut voucher. Looks like they straightened the top border on the back.
    image
  • Options
    i love Bert image

    ill take it if you dont want it... and yes, i think its trimmed, sorry.

    hope you didnt pay $$ for it.
  • Options
    digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
    Seller says he pulled it from a vending box himself, but will give me a refund if I'm not happy, so I'll be ok.

    I just wanted to get the groups oppinion before I ship it back. I've seen some odd cuts that were not uncommon with various issues, but when compared to all the 40 or so "good" 1971 Topps cards I own, this one is slightly different.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • Options
    julen23julen23 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭
    backs for '71s are a mofo for relatively decent centering!

    i think the card has been altered IMHO.

    j
    image
    RIP GURU
  • Options
    jmoran19jmoran19 Posts: 1,605 ✭✭✭
    psa 7

    Current obsession, all things Topps 1969 - 1972

  • Options
    markj111markj111 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭
    I wil guess that it comes back recolored, as that happens to many of my submissions. Seriously, I think it has a good shot at an 8 if it has not been altered.

    No way is it miscut.
  • Options
    digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭


    << <i>I wil guess that it comes back recolored >>



    There's no evidence of any recoloring. I examined this card under a bright light and a 10x loupe. The card looks awesome from the scan (I'm looking for a PSA 7 or better w/o chewed up corners), but that right edge just bugs me. It's not straight, and the edge (between surface and the "side" of the card) looks different from the other 3 edges.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • Options
    samspopsamspop Posts: 1,990 ✭✭✭
  • Options
    grote15grote15 Posts: 29,523 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If not trimmed, I'd guess PSA 7, too.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • Options
    Bottom9thBottom9th Posts: 2,695 ✭✭
    I'll got with 7 maybe 7.5
  • Options
    PSA 6.5
  • Options
    6 with a good shot at 7
    White Whales:
    1996 Select Certified Mirror Gold Ozzie Smith
    2006 Bowman Chrome Orange Refractor Chris Carpenter
  • Options
    digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
    Welp, got it back from PSA.....

    N6: MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENT 1971 TOPPS 26 BERT BLYLEVEN


    At least it isn't trimmed and I'll get a grading voucher, but a PSA 7 would have been nice.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • Options
    If it makes you feel better, my wife graded me the same: DIDNT MEET MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS
  • Options
    digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭


    << <i>If it makes you feel better, my wife graded me the same: DIDNT MEET MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS >>




    Did your wife get a voucher?
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • Options
    Diamond cut for sure.
    -Rome is Burning

    image
Sign In or Register to comment.