Coinstar DIME reject.......... (with Pics plus weird detail)

......... DANG - no silver!! 1977-D... Oh well, thought I'd share my silly coin & silly questions anyway!
Okay, it's pretty worn... so I'm guessing it was rejected for weight?
No reverse pics, because there is nothing of note on the reverse (normal overall wear with the rims pretty much gone) - but the obverse was interesting...
From about 12-2 o'clock is some metal that has been displaced?? Or lifted up, or pushed over??
But I don't understand how the "bump" occurred in the middle? Is this slot wear?? It looks like the side of the face was sheared off, but the "bump" seems to be smooth'ish, not really raised and definitely not indented? Nothing on the reverse to account for it either.... just a curiosity to me. Any ideas?
Coin on RIGHT (next 2 pics)




And yes, I'm bored..............
** Detail pics shown below in additional post **
Okay, it's pretty worn... so I'm guessing it was rejected for weight?
No reverse pics, because there is nothing of note on the reverse (normal overall wear with the rims pretty much gone) - but the obverse was interesting...
From about 12-2 o'clock is some metal that has been displaced?? Or lifted up, or pushed over??
But I don't understand how the "bump" occurred in the middle? Is this slot wear?? It looks like the side of the face was sheared off, but the "bump" seems to be smooth'ish, not really raised and definitely not indented? Nothing on the reverse to account for it either.... just a curiosity to me. Any ideas?
Coin on RIGHT (next 2 pics)




And yes, I'm bored..............

** Detail pics shown below in additional post **
0
Comments
Hmmmm....?
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
It's a light-strike/calibrating strike.
As you can see, the edge and devices are not "struck-up".
This is a fairly rare item, as most probably never leave the mint and only a handful would be produced at a time before properly calibrating the strike.
The reason you will see more of these as dimes then anything else is that the dime die is the most fragile of them all. If you use too much pressure, you will destroy your dies and/or not be able to use them at their full potential.
I own one of these and dug-up this old image of it...
I specialize in Errors, Minting, Counterfeit Detection & Grading.
Computer-aided grading, counterfeit detection, recognition and imaging.
<< <i>I know what this is;
It's a light-strike/calibrating strike.
As you can see, the edge and devices are not "struck-up".
This is a fairly rare item, as most probably never leave the mint and only a handful would be produced at a time before properly calibrating the strike.
The reason you will see more of these as dimes then anything else is that the dime die is the most fragile of them all. If you use too much pressure, you will destroy your dies and/or not be able to use them at their full potential.
I own one of these and dug-up this old image of it...
Does it only show on the obverse? And how does it effect the reverse?
I'll find it and weigh it sometime this week to verify that it was not struck on a foreign planchet.
I specialize in Errors, Minting, Counterfeit Detection & Grading.
Computer-aided grading, counterfeit detection, recognition and imaging.
<< <i>It does show on both sides.
I'll find it and weigh it sometime this week to verify that it was not struck on a foreign planchet. >>
Thanks, I would appreciate that!
Cool
1980-D: 2.29 grams
1980-P: 2.29 grams
1980-P: 2.24 grams
1978- : 2.29 grams
1977-D (SHOWN ABOVE): 2.16 grams
1970-D: 2.24 grams