A Bit OC, But That's A Great Looking 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle PSA 2

JackWESQ · February 1, 2008 11:10AM

A bit off-centered, but still a great looking 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle PSA 2:

Mantle Auction

/s/ JackWESQ

prscott933 · February 1, 2008 11:09AM

gorgeous!

bikerider60 · February 1, 2008 11:10AM

True.......Another reason why you buy the card not the slab.

nam812 · February 1, 2008 11:14AM

A great seller too. One of the hobby's good guys.

goose3 · February 1, 2008 11:17AM

I thought paper loss automatically rendered a card a "1"?

1960toppsguy · February 1, 2008 11:22AM

Depends upon whom submits it . . .

RipublicaninMass · February 1, 2008 11:38AM

<< <i>Depends upon whom submits it . . . >>

WinPitcher · February 1, 2008 11:45AM

What would you guys rather have this card or a 2 that has creases all over it?

I'd take this one all day long. Who cares what is on the cert?

Steve

Allen · February 1, 2008 12:11PM

When I was replying to the other thread about financing a Mantle not making sense, I did think to myself that a card like this one may be the only exception I would make. But if you think about it another good looking card like this will come along sometime in the next 13 months if you take the time to save up. Great card though.....anyone wana buy part of my collection so I can buy it?

Allen · February 1, 2008 12:12PM

What do you guys think the final price will be on this card?

1960toppsguy · February 1, 2008 12:17PM

I'll say it will not get a single bid.

WinPitcher · February 1, 2008 12:22PM

Allen I said basically the same thing.

I think it will get some bids.

The missing paper is not where the stats are at least.

Steve

RipublicaninMass · February 1, 2008 12:53PM

PSA 2's have been in a nose dive, but they ae still around 5200

Allen · February 1, 2008 1:05PM

Rip you have some number on the nose dive? I have not followed them much lately.

A Bit OC, But That's A Great Looking 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle PSA 2

Comments