grrrr!!! has anybody else had this??

I sent a card in.. a 62 post mantle.. ad back.. I thought it was a 9...
comes back a 4.. I get the card today.. and it has a noticable crease on the middle edge in...
never something I would miss.. especially when this card is known for that crease...
had to be caused by a handler... I am so ticked.. I handle these cards like they will crumble if I touch them
how are they doing it???
comes back a 4.. I get the card today.. and it has a noticable crease on the middle edge in...
never something I would miss.. especially when this card is known for that crease...
had to be caused by a handler... I am so ticked.. I handle these cards like they will crumble if I touch them
how are they doing it???
0
Comments
MY GOLD TYPE SET https://pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/complete-type-sets/gold-type-set-12-piece-circulation-strikes-1839-1933/publishedset/321940
Did you contact customer service prior to making this post?
but no.. I dont scan prior unfortunately..
this card is like a magazine ad ( it is exactly a magazine ad ) so it is much more fragile
like a piece of construction paper vs. cardboard..
I wish they were a little more careful.. I realize they are pressed for time.. but that could be a $400 -1000
swing in value they just caused..
I am upset but not devistated... ya know?? and there is no way to prove it wasnt there when I sent it...
so I will just chalk it up.. and scan I guess in the future.. but would be very hard to scan everything.. as i send it bulk subs lately
so far it seems like someone doesnt like mantle...
I dont like small tittle's...
I like the big tittle's.. but that is just me..
<< <i>grrrr!!! has anybody else had this?? >>
Yes, I have a '62 Mathews that I originally thought was an 8. I sent it in and it came back a 6 with a very small chip in the top border. It's hard to see from the scan, but it's on the top border, just to the left of his hat. I knew the chip wasn't there when I sent it in. I also knew that even with the chip, it was better than a 6. I cracked it out and sent it back in. It came back a 7 this time. The first scan shows the raw card before it was graded. The second scan shows the card slabbed as a 6 and I will update this as soon as the 7 comes back from PSA. If it was a crease, then I would be upset about it. However, since it is a chip, it is possible that it was there before, but still barely intact on the card so that I may have missed it.
Luckily they were relatively cheap cards but it was still frustrating. If it was one card, I might have thought it was my mistake. But since it was 2 cards, in order on the submission, I know I wouldn't have missed both.
I've had a few cards come back with dinged corners that I sure would have noticed when I pulled them from packs. Modern stuff, but a Bowman Chrome orange refractor really shows off the dings, so it would have been glaring before I sent it. Hoped for 9-10 as it was 60-40, came back an 8. I cry a little when I see others graded higher and know that it cost me at least $100 in value.
Had about 3-4 mystery corner dings on that sub . . .
I sent in a 1967 Maris that was clearly a 9, straight out of the middle of GAI 9 cello pack, even hoping for the first 10.
I should add that I am no novice at this, I have sent in thousands of cards, and always use a loop, etc.
Came back with a large crease across the front in a 4 holder.
I of course could not prove PSA did it, so I ate the loss.
I would be interested to know if anyone else has a better solution - scanning every card I send in seems a bit too tedious.