guess the circ. Morgan grade (big photos) >> grade in last post <<
DennisH
Posts: 13,995 ✭✭✭✭✭
What grade will PCGS give this deliciously original and eye-appealing circ. Morgan when I send it in?
It's a VAM 3 by the way.
It's a VAM 3 by the way.
When in doubt, don't.
0
Comments
To support LordM's European Trip, click here!
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
bob
60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
Curls of hair show enough wear.
Breast feathers well worn.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
If I do, will you kick off the bidding for me?
BTW, as a point of reference, here is the same date of a raw one I had for 20-30 years before I sent it to NGC and got the VF25 grade. Sold it years ago. Still have the images, so just resized them for the posting.
The reverse scratch is on the plastic. At the time I thought I got a lower grade than I should have but this is how tight they all grade dates like this, as you know.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
I was glad to see the "S" mintmark. Whenever I see that anyone has purchased an 1895-O I cringe.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
15
25
70% chance of VF25
Marmac's posted VF25 is undergraded IMO and should be a VF30 (the 1903-S) in post directly above.
Coxe's VF25 in the slab is 'spot on' with the grade IMO.
Greg Hansen, Melbourne, FL Click here for any current EBAY auctions Multiple "Circle of Trust" transactions over 14 years on forum
I would agree Gregg. Though I haven't recieved that one back yet, I sent it out thinking 30/35.
That 95-s is quite lovely.
Nice . .
Drunner
1. XF40 stands out as even more of a shining beacon of difference than it did before.
2. There's a large overlap of closely similar (and sometimes identical) wear characteristics that can be found on coins with much different grades. Lower hair curls, interior wing feathers, talons, oak eaves, wreath highpoints, wheat grains, neck feather collar, vertical lines in cotton bolls... these and many other areas are all things that go into determining the final grade of a given coin – but no single thing determines a given grade.
3. After trying to scrutinize and compare my raw coin with those already in holders, I have a much keener appreciation now for what pro graders mean by "you have to take the whole coin into consideration". (At least I think I do.)
Anyway, as I was doing this 10x loupe homework assignment I noticed something about the denticles on the coins that inspired me to put together the photo montage below. See if you notice what I did about denticle detail and coin grade:
In comparing the raw coin to my already graded VF assortment, I was able to find area of similarities with every single VF grade. However, it is clearly not an XF40... nor a Fine-15. In a side-by-side comparison it matches up favorably with the VF35, although that coin has had a quickie partial dip that makes it much brighter and allows lustre to show. The raw coin's natural toned surfaces, however, are a hinderance in this regard.
Taking the entire coin into account, the raw one seems to be a very comfortable fit with my other VF30s, and I like it better than one of them. My denticle photos above seem to support this as well.
<< <i>pee cee gee ess gave this un a 35
>>
Sweet.
Interesting montage, Dennis...
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
Will’sProoflikes
VF30
Nice coin.
bob