Question about this probable fake...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d736/4d736a94137c64eaf5af740a179f3eeda029f895" alt="Bjorn"
Hello all...
I was just perusing some ebay listings and found this German crown - it looks pretty good but I assume its fake due to the auction style. What would give away a coin of this caliber, as opposed to the 'made for tourist' fakes?
http://cgi.ebay.com/GERMANY-1842-2-THALER-COIN_W0QQitemZ220186585557QQihZ012QQcategoryZ540QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
I was just perusing some ebay listings and found this German crown - it looks pretty good but I assume its fake due to the auction style. What would give away a coin of this caliber, as opposed to the 'made for tourist' fakes?
http://cgi.ebay.com/GERMANY-1842-2-THALER-COIN_W0QQitemZ220186585557QQihZ012QQcategoryZ540QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
0
Comments
It's from China...
I'm too slow.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Enough red flags for you
Personally, even if I had a place for it in my collection, the S/H alone would exceed my max "gamble" bid.
(BTW, you can truncate any long EBay listing right after the item number and it will still work perfectly.)
Hit and Run 3-day listing
Just wait until a better example comes along. These are lousy pics not worth gambling on and those spots on either side make it worth waiting for a better example. And if that's not bad enough, the shipping cost surely should be a deterrent.
For what it's worth, I don't think this is a fake.. though I can't say with any certainty due to the poor pics. Simply being sold from China does not necessarily make it so! Also, it looks like it suffered a light cleaning at best and has at least one major contact mark.
So... back to my original point: wait for a better example of this coin.
My wantlist & references
The differences I see between the coins (based on the sellers cruddy pics) are:
1) The mouth and eye on the obverse look kind of funky, though I'm not entirely sure why
2) The "R" in "PRINZ" on the reverse strikes me as misshapen
3) The "E" in "BAYERN" on the obverse has the top and bottom serifs almost touching
You're right, this is quite a good counterfeit (assuming it is one). I bought a similarly remarkable 1958 S.A. 5s with George V on it for $5.
That's the world-famous MULE crown that got out of the mint back in '58!
SA specialists have been searching for it these last fifty years!
And you paid only five bucks for it ?????
That's fabulous!
I think I read about that a long time ago one of the specialized
catalogs...let's see: was it Pridmore or Remick?
Maybe Kaplan, ho ho! Check it out!
Happy New Year!
Tom
Proud (but humbled) "You Suck" Designee, February 2010.
Bjorn
<< <i>What would give away a coin of this caliber, as opposed to the 'made for tourist' fakes? >>
It's a good question, and not an easy one to answer. Sometimes it's a "softer-than-you-might-expect" strike, sometimes it's the dull, lackluster (literally) surfaces, sometimes it's just smoething "off" about it that I can't put a finger on. Usually the shapes and serifs of the lettering are off somehow- that is always the biggest clue for me on issues I'm familiar with. As this is not a type I've handled genuine examples of, I would have to rely more on color and strike.
In this case, that's in addition to the red flag issues that Roy just pointed out.
Todd
It actually is an icon uploaded by another user of a token, I believe a conder, from Dundee, Scotland.
You would think these sellers would hire a local english-speaking school teacher to proof their English auction language- man, something I hope they never do.
is that you end up being governed by inferiors. – Plato