PCGS Rosy dime grade set MS64-67, can you tell which is which?

Colorfulcoins

I have some 1963-P PCGS Rosy dimes - 4 so far in grades MS67, MS66, MS65, and MS64......which do you think is which (what order are the pics below)?

#1


#2


#3


#4

coinkid855

1st- 66
2nd- 65
3rd- 67
4th- 65

Very nice Roosies, btw.

robec

<< <i>1st- 66
2nd- 65
3rd- 67
4th- 65

Very nice Roosies, btw. >>



Took the words right out of my keyboard.

cohodk

65
65
67
66

jessewvu

they all look aweful to me.. But then again, who am I and what do I know? Here is my wag:
64
65
66
67

IRCWCoins

65
66
65
67

rainbowroosie

#3 has the most eye appeal --- is #1 FB?? Looks close.

coinkid855

I'm really curious about the actual grades....

-Paul

Batman23

1st- 66
2nd- 65
3rd- 65
4th- 67

I sure like the looks of numbers 3 and 4. Nice Dimes.

AU58WALKERS

#4 is the 67

Bochiman

All nice but really like #3 and #4.

Fairlaneman

66

65

65

67

There I have made a fool of myself....

Ken

cladking

66-2
65-3
67-4


#1 is overgraded.










typo do'h

roadrunner

65
66
65
67

Very hard to see the marks on the toners. But suffice to say I like the 2 toners the best for overall appeal.

roadrunner

coinsarefun

I like #2 the best

Did I win?

But I like almost all toners,but the green speaks to me

clackamas

65
66
65
67

mheffner2

1 - 65
2 - 67
3 - 65
4 - 66

Colorfulcoins

And the answer is............

#1 MS65
#2 MS66
#3 MS64
#4 MS67

Interesting to note, many guessers guessed the MS67 correctly as #4. Not sure why #1 is a MS65 - looks better to me. #2 has a big hit right on the end of the nose and so-so luster, #3 has lots of light marks on the portrait, and #4 has it all. None are FB bt #1 and #4 are both very close.

coinkid855

Wow. I suck. lol

DennisH

MS65
MS67
MS64
MS66


Edited to add: I guessed before looking at the results, honest!

Fairlaneman

<< <i>And the answer is............

#1 MS65
#2 MS66
#3 MS64
#4 MS67

Interesting to note, many guessers guessed the MS67 correctly as #4. Not sure why #1 is a MS65 - looks better to me. #2 has a big hit right on the end of the nose and so-so luster, #3 has lots of light marks on the portrait, and #4 has it all. None are FB bt #1 and #4 are both very close. >>



Where did the 64 come from? It was not listed at 6:13.....

Ken

roadrunner

Yeah, the 64 was edited in after I guessed too. C'est la vie.

roadrunner

options26

65
66
64
67

Thats easy(Only if I am right)

cladking

<< <i>And the answer is............

#1 MS65
#2 MS66
#3 MS64
#4 MS67

Interesting to note, many guessers guessed the MS67 correctly as #4. Not sure why #1 is a MS65 - looks better to me. #2 has a big hit right on the end of the nose and so-so luster, #3 has lots of light marks on the portrait, and #4 has it all. None are FB bt #1 and #4 are both very close. >>




#2 appears to have smooth creamy luster under the toning and was well struck by good dies.

#1 appears to be very charitably graded from the picture. It's a nice coin but is pretty beat up.

#3 is close to MS-65 perhaps. At least it looks like a low end 65 to me.

#4 is just nice. A little more strike and it might go even higher.

Colorfulcoins

#2 appears to have smooth creamy luster under the toning and was well struck by good dies.

- - - Clearly, but there's a big hit right on the end of the nose....bit short on luster

#1 appears to be very charitably graded from the picture. It's a nice coin but is pretty beat up.

- - - Coin looks (to me) much better than MS65....its quite clean but the unusual toning may have limited the grade

#3 is close to MS-65 perhaps. At least it looks like a low end 65 to me.

- - - Absolute blazer with huge eye appeal but lots of tiny scratches across the portraint - nothing big

#4 is just nice. A little more strike and it might go even higher.

- - - Very solid for grade; unfortunately, a tick right on the lower bands eliminated what might otherwise be FB