1809 CBH.....PO-1?

TennesseeDave

For you that like the very worn,heres an 1809 CBH that looks like a 1 to me and only $39 delivered.This isn't my auction and I do not know the seller.Just thought i'd post it in case someone needs one for a lowball set.link

Goldbully

PO-½

doh

Amazingly problem free for that amount of wear. I like it!

SomeGuyFromMichigan

Hey, bet you guys didn't think someone could attribute this one !
It's an O-106 R-3

fc

really worn coins just do not excite me unless they have a look that
says buy me. this one does not.

plus, i do not care to try to profit of it. maybe someone else?!?

i have said it before and will say it again. a low ball set should not
be based entirely on grade. eye appeal is just as a big a factor
as a MS collection.

in this case you might as well buy a unstruck planchet. there just is
not much to look at.

SilverEagles92

10 bucks says either Marty or Braddick end up with this coin.

dan383

THANKS..........

I just found my new "pocket piece"

My old one , a 1964-d Kennedy is in PCGS plastic ( PO01 ) .

That took 30 something years ! This should be ready in maybe one..........

Thanks again..



Dan

GoldenEyeNumismatics

<< <i>really worn coins just do not excite me unless they have a look that
says buy me. this one does not.

plus, i do not care to try to profit of it. maybe someone else?!?

i have said it before and will say it again. a low ball set should not
be based entirely on grade. eye appeal is just as a big a factor
as a MS collection.

in this case you might as well buy a unstruck planchet. there just is
not much to look at. >>



People don't always buy coins for aesthetic reasons, or for grade reasons. Sometimes, people buy coins for the history they've seen.

fc

People don't always buy coins for aesthetic reasons, or for grade reasons. Sometimes, people buy coins for the history they've seen.

then any condition will do if you are basing it on the date alone eh?
but i think you mean the path they have traveled.. more so then the
age in reference to a well worn coin like this where almost all the
details are gone?

thanks for sharing your opinion.

fc

ugh double post.

numisma

<< <i>Hey, bet you guys didn't think someone could attribute this one !
It's an O-106 R-3 >>



SomeGuyFromMichigan, nice job on the attribution! I agree with you. Did you use the die crack connecting all of the stars on the left as the diagnostic?

Colorfulcoins

Not a lock PO01, probably 2:3 odds but chance FR02 given the star detail on obv.

SomeGuyFromMichigan

Thanks numisma!
No, I used the T to I alignment plus the alignment of the verticle of the
(TAKING A STRAIGHT LINE ALONG THE BACK OF THE 5) 5 to the claws.
Funny thing when I first looked at it and checked Overton's I thought
this was one of the R-5's.
But with closer inspection an R-3.
If you notice the reverses of 09, 4 have this T to I alignment
and it is the only one with this 5 alignment.
The last one made it positive !
Mike

JJM

nice slick

Danegeld

PO-.5 I'd say

homerunhall

I'll pay $100...

hrh

Colorfulcoins

hrh, where were you when I was selling all my duplicate PO01's? I was getting $15-30 for them......ouch. May still have a few PCGS slabbed dups if your interested....