The difference between a 67RD IH and a 68RD
shylock
Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
68RD vs 67RD
The first is imaged by Heritage, the second by Lakesammman. Lakes has the edge there.
His image shows the true color so much better.
But as nice as Lake's coin is, compare the date strikes. No contest, the Heritage 1899 rules.
That's the difference between a rare 67RD and a one of a kind 68RD.
The first is imaged by Heritage, the second by Lakesammman. Lakes has the edge there.
His image shows the true color so much better.
But as nice as Lake's coin is, compare the date strikes. No contest, the Heritage 1899 rules.
That's the difference between a rare 67RD and a one of a kind 68RD.
Paul <> altered surfaces <> CoinGallery.org
0
Comments
I paid 6K for mine - who got the better deal??
But yeah, the strike -- particularly on the second '9' in the date -- is way more hammered on the 68.
Gotta love heritage photography. Whomever taught them how to overexpose like that did a great job!
siliconvalleycoins.com
Here is the 1899 from a 1996 print.
Edited to change I to "we", as BWRC and I were partners at the time.
<< <i>I'd like to see them side by side to get a better feel. I think getting a 68R is just a luck at the grading factory. When I viewed the 68, I wasn't too impressed with it being better than a 67.
I paid 6K for mine - who got the better deal?? >>
I think any one point increase in grade from 66 to 70 is just luck.
How much did the 68 sell for? Probably a lot more than I would have been willing to pay.
MS68RD sold for $69,000 1/11/2003
I've owned both of the coins and don't think I would pay the "difference" between the two grades today, allthough I agree with PCGS which coin is the best.
Rick - nice pic. I guess the diamonds are OK.
<< <i>MS68RD sold for $69,000 1/11/2003 >>
wow
<< <i>Isn't the MS68 unique? >>
allthough the population report shows 2 graded as MS68RD in 1899 most would agree with me that the pop report is in error and only the coin in this thread exists.
<< <i>allthough the population report shows 2 graded as MS68RD in 1899 most would agree with me that the pop report is in error and only the coin in this thread exists. >>
I'm sorry, but I just have to question the rationale of paying $69,000 for a coin of which 53,598,000 were minted for circulation. This is taking the concept of condition rarity to the extreme!
Edited to clarify: Pop 1 for the bronze Indian Cent series.
Add my 1899 PCGS MS-66RD to the equation (sold to me by Eagle Eye a few years back and previously owned by a well respected collector of NDN cents) and now lets analyze the difference between all three!
Keep in mind that if you study all three, there are differences in strength of strike and detail but I will allow the real experts here to analyze and praise and criticize each piece as warranted.
<< <i>68RD vs 67RD
The first is imaged by Heritage, the second by Lakesammman. Lakes has the edge there.
His image shows the true color so much better.
But as nice as Lake's coin is, compare the date strikes. No contest, the Heritage 1899 rules.
That's the difference between a rare 67RD and a one of a kind 68RD. >>
Not to take away anything away from this thread, the coin is very exceptional to say the least. But I will differ
with you that Lake's pic show's the strike much better than Heritage's. Actually, Heritage's picture sucks
when compared. And here's why! Heritage, as they do to 99% of the pics on their website, they place the lighting
at 7 o'clock destroying any 3d effect of the coins design. The full design in the headdress is almost completely gone.
Here's another pic from their website, God knows, I had a very large selection to choose from. The first is a thumbnail
pic for that auction/lot. Notice that very tiny shinny/white chin and nose or eyeball, again the lighting is from the WRONG angle.
Whenever, and I seldom do anymore, go to their website to check a few of their coins and it doesn't take but a couple of
minutes, if I see those shinny little chins in their thumbnails, GOODBYE, I'll pass right on by them. There's no sense in clicking
on the lot to see a larger misrepresentation of the coin!
What's up with the bad pictures?
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
bow down to the finest business strike IH of all time.
That pre-digital image provided by Rick Snow is the coin forum at its best. Thanks Rick.
There's a reason why Epstein wanted that coin back, and why PCGS 68'd it.
Whoever owns it now has the finest IH business strike of all time.