Home U.S. Coin Forum

What happened?

What happened to the thread about the Seated Dimes not crossing. Did it get nuked?

Comments

  • EdscoinEdscoin Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭
    Went POOF.image
    ED
    .....................................................
  • DoogyDoogy Posts: 4,508


    << <i>What happened to the thread about the Seated Dimes not crossing. Did it get nuked? >>



    sadly, yes.
  • droopyddroopyd Posts: 5,381 ✭✭✭
    Too bad. It was a legitimate "non-bashing" discussion when I last looked in.
    Me at the Springfield coin show:
    image
    60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
  • tahoe98tahoe98 Posts: 11,388 ✭✭✭


    i was right in the middle of reading a post the other day and in a flash it went POOF! i think it was the thread about 'past tense members'

    image
    "government is not reason, it is not eloquence-it is a force! like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." George Washington
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,086 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Too bad. It was a legitimate "non-bashing" discussion when I last looked in. >>



    This is non-bashing?



    << <i>Why does PCGS not hire graders who can grade Seated Dimes? They are looking at too many MS70 Modern coins I guess.

    Today I will remove my set from PCGS, it will go unfinished.

    I do not believe that PCGS has graders with the talent to grade Seated Dimes. I have seen coins in vg holder that were at least VF. I have posted pictures of 2 dimes of the same date and asked you, the readers, which coin is a higher grade. Not 1 person picked the PCGS AU50 over the ANACS45. Why? Because depending on the day and the grader they are all over the place.

    I recently took 8 dimes all NGC gradee and failry so, including a 1856 S that the vast majority of the board reader grade a MS62 or better a few months back. I looked at the coins carefully under a stereo microscope and felt 4 of the 8 would cross over with no problem at all. 3 of the 8 should cross over but might not if "they were in a bad mood" and 1 coin I did not think would but it was worth a shot.

    Well I guess they were in a really bad mood or have been looking at way to many MS69/70 Eagles this week.

    With this kind of result I have to just shake my head and ask what are they thinking?

    Line # Item # Cert # PCGS No. CoinDate Denomination Variety Country Grade
    1 1 12273398 4632 1860-O 10C US DNC
    2 1 12273399 4582 1842-O 10C US DNC
    3 1 12273400 4598 1852-O 10C US DNC
    4 1 12273401 4613 1856-S 10C US DNC
    5 1 12273402 4648 1868-S 10C US DNC
    6 1 12273403 4609 1856 10C Small Date US DNC
    7 1 12273404 4705 1890-S 10C US DNC
    8 1 12273405 4687 1879 10C US DNC >>



    Frankly, I'm surprised PCGS let it go as long as they did.

    Russ, NCNE
  • JoeLewisJoeLewis Posts: 1,910 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Too bad. It was a legitimate "non-bashing" discussion when I last looked in. >>



    This is non-bashing?



    << <i>Why does PCGS not hire graders who can grade Seated Dimes? They are looking at too many MS70 Modern coins I guess.

    Today I will remove my set from PCGS, it will go unfinished.

    I do not believe that PCGS has graders with the talent to grade Seated Dimes. I have seen coins in vg holder that were at least VF. I have posted pictures of 2 dimes of the same date and asked you, the readers, which coin is a higher grade. Not 1 person picked the PCGS AU50 over the ANACS45. Why? Because depending on the day and the grader they are all over the place.

    I recently took 8 dimes all NGC gradee and failry so, including a 1856 S that the vast majority of the board reader grade a MS62 or better a few months back. I looked at the coins carefully under a stereo microscope and felt 4 of the 8 would cross over with no problem at all. 3 of the 8 should cross over but might not if "they were in a bad mood" and 1 coin I did not think would but it was worth a shot.

    Well I guess they were in a really bad mood or have been looking at way to many MS69/70 Eagles this week.

    With this kind of result I have to just shake my head and ask what are they thinking?

    Line # Item # Cert # PCGS No. CoinDate Denomination Variety Country Grade
    1 1 12273398 4632 1860-O 10C US DNC
    2 1 12273399 4582 1842-O 10C US DNC
    3 1 12273400 4598 1852-O 10C US DNC
    4 1 12273401 4613 1856-S 10C US DNC
    5 1 12273402 4648 1868-S 10C US DNC
    6 1 12273403 4609 1856 10C Small Date US DNC
    7 1 12273404 4705 1890-S 10C US DNC
    8 1 12273405 4687 1879 10C US DNC >>



    Frankly, I'm surprised PCGS let it go as long as they did.

    Russ, NCNE >>



    POOF again image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file