High probability that it is Japanese in that case. I'm checking it out. >>
Well, it wasn't, as DCH pointed out. The Japanese reading of the characters (right, left, top, bottom) is "Ju Ho Ei Nei", which doesn't mean anything, or match any series.
That seems an awfully crisp strike and sharp detail for a Song Dynasty piece, at least in my (very limited) experience. Mine all have the dirt from the excavation on 'em, and are truly crusty.
Are we sure it's real and not a replica/charm of some kind? I mean, the real ones are cheap enough- I think I paid two bucks apiece for mine, in bulk, but I know there are a lot of replicas out there. (Which were made not so much to fool anybody but for use in jewelry and charms and such...)
If this one is crusty, I guess that's a good sign. It's way sharper than the ones I have, I can say that much.
DCH has indeed nailed it but I'll put in my two cents, or two cash, as the case may be.
Ding Fubao (the "Ding" of Fisher's Ding) has some interesting notes on this issue. It was minted in the beginning of the 1102-1106 period and was first valued at 10 "cash" but the intrinsic value was far less and the coin was revalued to 5 in short order. The government was unable to stop private minting and eventually the coin was revalued once again to 3. There are examples cast in iron but they are rare.
This can be found on page 96b of Ding Fubao. Ding numbered the three varieties DCH mentioned as 1048, 1049, and 1050. The Ding numbers are the same as the Fisher's Ding (FD) numbers.
Roy, there are many examples of uniface cast coins in China and Korea, as well as Japan. I am not as familiar with the coins of Annam but I think there are uniface issues to be found among them as well.
When reading the four character inscriptions there are two ways to do it: top-bottom-right-left or top-right-bottom-left. Given the position of the "zhong bao" in this case it has to be t-b-r-l. There is also a chongning yuanbao from this period but in that case the characters are read clockwise starting from the top (t-r-b-l).
I am not sure but wouldn't the Japanese reading be "sunei juho?" I am not so good with Japanese readings but I think that might be the right one.
Um, didn't we already identify it down to its catalogue number? What more would you like to know? I have another reference that I haven't checked yet. I will see if I can find more information.
The coin was minted c.1102 A.D., it's not listed in your book. You'll probably only find this coin listed in a specialized reference on Chinese cast coinage...Fisher's Ding, Hartill or Schjoth are the ones I know of.
Silverpop, I gave you just about all the info in Ding Fubao. As the others have said, I don't think you are going to find this in general world coin books. We do know for sure that it was minted between 1102 and 1106 and probably in the earlier years of that range.
I am home now so I will see what else I can find in my other references...
Oh, that's right! I forgot that you guys were the same!
I found a great deal of information on this coin, by the way, far more than most people would ever want to know. Lots of stuff on variations in calligraphy, size and weight, mints, regions of circulation, revaluations, counterfeiting issues (punishable by death!) and the like but the little tidbit from Ding wraps it up, I suppose. My Chinese is not good enough for me to get through all the text right away. The entry goes on for pages and pages.
There is so much to know in this world. Where will we ever find the time to study everything?
Comments
<< <i>The coin is blank on the back >>
High probability that it is Japanese in that case. I'm checking it out.
Will need to know the size to narrow it down any further.
~27mm H16.405 Small coin, probably unofficial. Cross referenced as FD 1048, S 620.
~31mm H16.406 Smaller size ? 5 Cash. No cross reference.
~36mm H16.407-16.409 10 Cash. FD 1050, S 622.
All listed as very common.
<< <i>
<< <i>The coin is blank on the back >>
High probability that it is Japanese in that case. I'm checking it out. >>
Well, it wasn't, as DCH pointed out. The Japanese reading of the characters (right, left, top, bottom) is "Ju Ho Ei Nei", which doesn't mean anything, or match any series.
Weighs less then 1oz (between 10 and 20 grams)
https://www.omnicoin.com/security/users/profile
Are we sure it's real and not a replica/charm of some kind? I mean, the real ones are cheap enough- I think I paid two bucks apiece for mine, in bulk, but I know there are a lot of replicas out there. (Which were made not so much to fool anybody but for use in jewelry and charms and such...)
If this one is crusty, I guess that's a good sign. It's way sharper than the ones I have, I can say that much.
It from china but beyond that they had no idea
the coin is very crusty, looks to be dug from the ground, the lighting i used makes the details sharper then they really are
https://www.omnicoin.com/security/users/profile
Ding Fubao (the "Ding" of Fisher's Ding) has some interesting notes on this issue. It was minted in the beginning of the 1102-1106 period and was first valued at 10 "cash" but the intrinsic value was far less and the coin was revalued to 5 in short order. The government was unable to stop private minting and eventually the coin was revalued once again to 3. There are examples cast in iron but they are rare.
This can be found on page 96b of Ding Fubao. Ding numbered the three varieties DCH mentioned as 1048, 1049, and 1050. The Ding numbers are the same as the Fisher's Ding (FD) numbers.
Roy, there are many examples of uniface cast coins in China and Korea, as well as Japan. I am not as familiar with the coins of Annam but I think there are uniface issues to be found among them as well.
When reading the four character inscriptions there are two ways to do it: top-bottom-right-left or top-right-bottom-left. Given the position of the "zhong bao" in this case it has to be t-b-r-l. There is also a chongning yuanbao from this period but in that case the characters are read clockwise starting from the top (t-r-b-l).
I am not sure but wouldn't the Japanese reading be "sunei juho?" I am not so good with Japanese readings but I think that might be the right one.
Now the question
Does anyone have a good idea of exactly what kind of coin this is and where it's from?
https://www.omnicoin.com/security/users/profile
since i don't have this Ding Fubao book the info you gave me is not very useful to me
https://www.omnicoin.com/security/users/profile
china cash coin made in 1102 A.D is the ID of this coin?
https://www.omnicoin.com/security/users/profile
<< <i>Ok
china cash coin made in 1102 A.D is the ID of this coin? >>
Almost.
"China cash coin made sometime about 1102 A.D."
"c." in front of a date stands for "circa", Latin for "about".
So the coin was made in the 1100's basically and is a cash coin from china
Good enough info for me to put it into my collection
https://www.omnicoin.com/security/users/profile
I am home now so I will see what else I can find in my other references...
That just dawned on me.
It was seeing that coin and then seeing your avatar over there that clued me in.
I found a great deal of information on this coin, by the way, far more than most people would ever want to know. Lots of stuff on variations in calligraphy, size and weight, mints, regions of circulation, revaluations, counterfeiting issues (punishable by death!) and the like but the little tidbit from Ding wraps it up, I suppose. My Chinese is not good enough for me to get through all the text right away.
There is so much to know in this world. Where will we ever find the time to study everything?