Options
50's set builders, a question.
BobS
Posts: 1,738 ✭✭
So.....even though my current card budget from the boss (see WIFE) is only about $100/month, I really want to finish my raw 56 topps baseball set this coming year.
I've been working on the set slowly for about 2 years, picking up singles and small lot's on e-Bay and from shows. I'm building a STRICT EX-NM+ set. Also, almost every card I have is centered very well. If I sent it in to PSA, I'd expect PSA 5-7 grades.
So far, I have about 1/3 of the commons, a few minor stars, the Clemente, Aaron and the Yankees team card. The big ones left include Mantle, Mays, Koufax, Williams, Robinson and a few others.
So now the question. What advice can anyone offer on how to get this done on my budget (if possible). I know if I want all of the stars in the grade I'm shooting for, it won't happen. A nice raw or PSA 5 Mantle is $500 alone. I've contemplated picking up the rest of the stars graded, but I think I would have to settle for PSA 1-5. And, for the same $$, I could find at least EX raw copies. Should I just concentrate on the star cards now, figuring the commons can always be picked upped later, or try and get all of the commons so at least the set will 'appear' more complete as the year goes on. Finally, say you were looking at a nice raw EX-NM+ set from 1956, except the Mantle was a PSA 1 with nice eye appeal (maybe a stain/paper loss on the back), and the Williams, Mays, Koufax, etc. were PSA 3-5? Would you feel the set as a whole is lesser or greater than a completely raw set with raw EX stars, or does the piece of mind of at least having the stars "authentic" appeal to you?
Comments?
I've been working on the set slowly for about 2 years, picking up singles and small lot's on e-Bay and from shows. I'm building a STRICT EX-NM+ set. Also, almost every card I have is centered very well. If I sent it in to PSA, I'd expect PSA 5-7 grades.
So far, I have about 1/3 of the commons, a few minor stars, the Clemente, Aaron and the Yankees team card. The big ones left include Mantle, Mays, Koufax, Williams, Robinson and a few others.
So now the question. What advice can anyone offer on how to get this done on my budget (if possible). I know if I want all of the stars in the grade I'm shooting for, it won't happen. A nice raw or PSA 5 Mantle is $500 alone. I've contemplated picking up the rest of the stars graded, but I think I would have to settle for PSA 1-5. And, for the same $$, I could find at least EX raw copies. Should I just concentrate on the star cards now, figuring the commons can always be picked upped later, or try and get all of the commons so at least the set will 'appear' more complete as the year goes on. Finally, say you were looking at a nice raw EX-NM+ set from 1956, except the Mantle was a PSA 1 with nice eye appeal (maybe a stain/paper loss on the back), and the Williams, Mays, Koufax, etc. were PSA 3-5? Would you feel the set as a whole is lesser or greater than a completely raw set with raw EX stars, or does the piece of mind of at least having the stars "authentic" appeal to you?
Comments?
0
Comments
What's the hurry? Why does it have to be completed this year? It sounds like you've been taking your time building it, so I wouldn't rush it at this point. It sounds like you have a very nice set and if you rush to complete it this next year, you are definitely going to have to lower your standards (whether raw or graded) to finsih it on that budget. If it were me, I would slowly continue to build it in the condition that you want and the budget you are allowed.
<< <i>Finally, say you were looking at a nice raw EX-NM+ set from 1956, except the Mantle was a PSA 1 with nice eye appeal (maybe a stain/paper loss on the back), and the Williams, Mays, Koufax, etc. were PSA 3-5? Would you feel the set as a whole is lesser or greater than a completely raw set with raw EX stars >>
Yes! Yes! Yes! The stars are the first thing one looks for and if a potential buyer sees that those are in lesser grade, they are going to think that is indicative of the rest of the set.
David
My reasoning for finishing the set this year is I want to build another set, of coarse (57 fb). I'm afraid if I start that one, I may never finish the baseball set.
And, I don't completely understand the Yes!Yes!Yes! Should I loook for EX raw stars or the lower graded PSA conterparts.
Bosox1976
When I answered "Yes! Yes! Yes!" I actually mis-understood your question. I thought you were asking whether or not buyers would look at the lower grade stars and just assume that the rest of the set was in the same condition. Sorry about that I had to go back and re-read the question. But to answer that question, I would have to say that I would rather have a raw set that is a consistant Ex throughout rather than having and Ex set with the stars in a lesser PSA grade and knowing for sure they were authentic. But that's just me. You could always pick up the raw Ex stars at shows and measure them and inspect them more closely and still be pretty confident that they are authentic.
Good luck!
Ron
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
I wasn't too fond of the settling for PSA stars in the sub-5 range, now I'm conviced. And great EX-NM stars still can be found at the quarterly show I atttend religously.
Mike - I really don't want to loose any of the NM ones I've worked so hard to find. There's actually a nice shop only a few blocks from work. I went there yesterday just to look around. He had a 56 commons box, so I took a look. His cards were georgous. Problem was they were all priced at full beckett ($12-$16 a piece). I just can't do that much I told him, especially since my set is not that nice. He said he couldn't move on the pricing at all. Bummer. However, the quarterly show is this weekend, so I'll spend my usual 5 hours looking through all the dealers books for the $6 EX-NM commons, and keep an eye out for the star cards NOT priced like PSA 7's.
http://sportsfansnews.com/author/andy-fischer/
y