Have you ever contributed a coin photo to wikipedia?

I was just browsing some of the coin articles over at Wikipedia and I was surprised to see how poor many of the coin photos were. I was wondering if any of you have contributed your coin images to an article. If anyone on the web is in a position to improve the coin images at wikipedia, its forum members from here and across the street.
0
Comments
"... frequently biased text."
------------------------------
You mean, like biased against half dollars??
~
"America suffers today from too much pluribus and not enough unum.".....Arthur Schlesinger Jr.
<< <i>Much of that publication is as good as the scholarship that goes into it – in order words: "Crapipedia." The coin images are certainly consistent with the error-filled, frequently biased text. >>
That may be the case for some articles (political ones in particular); but, from what I understand, the accuracy of wikipedia is on par with that of any of the other online encyclopedias (e.g., britannica). Is wikipedia useful for "real" research? Probably not, except perhaps as a jumping off point to get ideas for doing real literature searches. Is wikipedia useful for general topic browsing? Probably as much as any other encyclopedia.