The 1967 Topps registry is as confusing as ever!
acowa
Posts: 945 ✭✭
Sky's set has a weighted GPA of 8.45 with 100% completion and has a rating of 8.41. Jim Merrills set has an 8.04 GPA (also at 100%) with an 8.09 set rating. The never to be finished set has a higher completion % and a higher weighted GPA than cdsingles set...but ranks almost one full point (.78) lower than cdsingles.
Is CU using the BCS formula or what???
Also, is it just me...or should there be a seperate forum for the 1972 elitists to post their stuff? I have tried...but they won't let me in their club.
Regards,
Alan
Is CU using the BCS formula or what???
Also, is it just me...or should there be a seperate forum for the 1972 elitists to post their stuff? I have tried...but they won't let me in their club.
Regards,
Alan
0
Comments
Its actually somewhat embarrasing... It does seem like us 72 guys are hogging up the board lately. Probably something to do with pathetic little lives....
If I could afford 67's I'm sure I'd be off driving my Lexus or something.
But, for the sake of cutting back on future abuse, I for one will restrain my enthusiasm and try to give other folks a chance.
Tongue in cheek,
Frank Bakka (wretched 72 guy...)
Sets - 1970, 1971 and 1972
Always looking for 1972 O-PEE-CHEE Baseball in PSA 9 or 10!
lynnfrank@earthlink.net
outerbankyank on eBay!
Whadya think Frank?
Did you get the check yet? If not, probably Monday.
Dale
1st Finest Set - 1981 Baseball Fleer Master - Retired
1st Finest Set - 1955 Baseball Golden Stamps - Cleveland Indians - Retired
1st Finest Set - Mel Harder Baseball Master - Active
Mel Harder Showcase Set - Active
#15 on Current Set Registry - 1972 Topps Baseball - Retired
#23 on All Time Set Registry - 1972 Topps Baseball - Retired
Mike
"If I could afford 67's I'm sure I'd be off driving my Lexus or something."
It's a Volvo, actually...
Alan.. I can't understand the set rating either. Every time I check, at least mine changes. It was 7.96 just 2 days ago!! I'm not sure how it jumped so much!! I upgraded 3 cards but it shouldn't have changed that much. BJ once gave me the formula for figuring the set rating, but I've never been able to make sense of it.
JM
FROM BJ...
A note about set ratings. On those sets where there are weighted varieites, it is possible to have a 100% completed set with a Weighted GPA of say, 7.80 and a Set Rating of 7.75. This is due to the fact that the set rating is based on the best possible weights. In other words, if a card has two varieties, one weighted 1 and the other weighted 3, the 3 is used in the calculation of the set ratings. If your set contains the lower weighted variety, you will see a disparity in your GPA and the Set Rating. However, sets that have no varieites or weights should have equal GPAs and Set Ratings if the sets are 100% complete. Based on this information, please report any problems you may see.
Carlos
As I recall when I met you at the 2000 National, didn't you have a Lexus keychain? Thus may I conclude that you drive a Lexus? My next question is this: how do you find the time to put together the world's best '67 set and drive a Lexus? We must know!
All,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if a complete set with all 8's or 9's has more stars in 9 than commons , the GPA should be higher than the rating. If a set has a lot of 9 commons and all the stars in 8, the GPA will be lower than the rating.
The funny and ironic part of all this is that I was driving a Lexus when I met you at the Nationals in Anaheim! It was a LX470 SUV.
Sky
"Give me a reason to fly, and I'll be there"
I meant the one in which you say is correct.