T206 Cy Young Rejected by SGC - too small??

I sent a Tolstoi T206 Cy Young to SGC to be graded and it came back rejected because the "minimum size requirement was not met". I'm not sure what to do with the card now. It wasn't sent back as counterfeit or trimmed, so should I send it to another grading service, or will they reject it for the same reason. How do I determine value? Any suggestions?
0
Comments
However, if that is not the case, then sure, send it in to another grading company. Got a scan?
SGC is basically saying that the card is authentic and unaltered, but that they do not grade cards that are factory cut too small. PSA and GAI share this policy.
<< <i>Why would you file a Paypal claim? >>
Because it sounds to me like it might be trimmed.
<< <i>SGC is basically saying that the card is authentic and unaltered, but that they do not grade cards that are factory cut too small. PSA and GAI share this policy >>
I have a T206 Johnny Evers that is almost 1/16th of an inch too short that says otherwise.
ToppsGuy - thanks for your scans - it looks like it's worth sending mine to PSA for grading... Can I send a single card to PSA for grading without joining?
<< <i>Can I send a single card to PSA for grading without joining? >>
No, you will need to purchase a membership, but it includes free submission vouchers (among other stuff) that more than pays for the membership fee.
<< <i> >>
If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all.
1955 Bowman baseball is notorious for large and small factory cuts, and many of the small ones will simply not work their way into holders. If SGC thought the card was trimmed, they would have said so. I stand by my original answer -- and your repsonse was quite nitpicky, especially as I did not specifically identify the margin of error that would be permissable between encapsulation and return of card and grading fee.
<< <i>and your repsonse was quite nitpicky, especially as I did not specifically identify the margin of error >>
What do you mean you did not specifically identify the margin of error? You did not mention ANY margin of error in your original post. Your response was, " that they do not grade cards that are factory cut too small." Now you're saying that they do, but....
If you took my response as nitpicky it was not intended to be. It was to show the original poster that they will grade cards that are factory cut too small and give him some sort of hope. Let's say that you are right (factory cut too small) and I am wrong (trimmed) and that his card is factory cut too short by less than 1/16th of an inch. Well then, you took any hope away from him by telling him that they do not grade cards that are factory cut too small, when indeed they do.