Is this a mistake?

Frankcoins

Carefully read this paragraph from Collectors Universe's 10K report filed last month
with the Securities and Exchange Commission

http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/fetchFilingFrameset.aspx?dcn=0001089143-07-000012&Type=HTML

The Certified Con Exchange (CCE) website, which we purchased in 2005, is a business-to-business website for recognized dealers in the trade. Currently, there are over 200,000 certified coins being offered at bid and ask at an aggregate value of over $200 million, an increase in excess of 100% of the number of items offered on average in the previous year. The liquidity afforded the units traded on CCE increases the demand for PCGS certified coins.

Goldbully

Linky Dinky

VamGuy

No, it reads about right.

Coxe

The numbers are probably correct. I don't agree with the liquidity statement, <deleted qualification prior to posting>. That is CU, the corporation, just like all of the other public corporations out there. It's all in the presentation and how it is customarily done. OT for this coin forum I think.

Frankcoins

<< <i>The numbers are probably correct. OT for this coin forum I think. >>



You didn't read it carefully!

percyb

I'd say it's not geared solely for business to business.

ebaytrader

Nothing in that seems out of sorts. What's the problem?

MisterBungle

+1

~

oxy8890

This was started as a b2b site, and then expanded to a b2b and b2c site. The numbers show 200,000 units at an average of $1,000 per sale offering. This equals $200,000,000 in aggregate supply which is in some circles is referred to as aggregate value. This is up over 100% YOY.

This all makes sense to me but then again, I am not a linguist or a lawyer going over an S&E report with a decoder ring and a fine tooth comb looking for errors.

Since you seem to think that your IQ is 50 points higher than the rest of us regarding this document, please explain your point so we may become as enlightened as you are?

Frankcoins

<< <i>

Since you seem to think that your IQ is 50 points higher than the rest of us regarding this document, please explain your point so we may become as enlightened as you are? >>



Certified CON Exchange

oxy8890

Oops didn't catch that. You're linguistic skills are much better than mine.

My hat's off to you. That is funny.

They might want to fix that.

Coxe

Good eye! Better than the rest of us and the CU proofreaders, lawyers, ... Funny.

19Lyds

Whoopsie Doodles! I guess spell checker needs to be used the next time.

Oh well, if life were perfect, we'd all get bored!

mnmcoin

<< <i>

<< <i>

Since you seem to think that your IQ is 50 points higher than the rest of us regarding this document, please explain your point so we may become as enlightened as you are? >>



Certified CON Exchange >>



Again, whats the mistake...I don't see any misspeaking.

morris

BlindedByEgo

fullerfun4

Spellcheck didn't work because the error spelled another correct word. It had to actually have been proof read by a real person with a good eye and a decent education.
Regards
Gary

Boom

RWB

Interesting -- Didn't read that as a mistake....SEC filings are supposed to be factual.

jmski52

At least they certify it.