Home U.S. Coin Forum

Jefferson guys, lets play grade the jeffery

name the variety which shouldn't be to hard, and grade it image

image

image
image

Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill

Comments

  • HyperionHyperion Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭
    it's a 71 Jeff...and Im going to say it's never seen circulation image
  • pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭
    LOL

    well your close, but "no cuban for you"
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 7,960 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1971 No S

    PR-65 Cameo
    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭


    << <i>1971 No S

    PR-65 Cameo >>



    well the variety is correct, and the designation is correct, but your wayyyyyyyy off on the grade.
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    And here I thought I would see a gold coin. image
  • 1971 MS70 Cameo
    Looking for the best or the best I can afford.........Doug
  • savoyspecialsavoyspecial Posts: 7,311 ✭✭✭✭
    no S variety--aprox 1600 minted
    PR68CAM

    am i close?
    greg

    www.brunkauctions.com

  • tightbudgettightbudget Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭
    71-S PR68CAM
  • pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭


    << <i>no S variety--aprox 1600 minted
    PR68CAM

    am i close?
    greg >>



    ding ding ding

    I did not expect anyone to get it that quick. This coin was originally in Frank Corso's set until I aquired it in y2k. I fought for a few years to try and get it bumped to 69, IMO this deffinately rates a 69. If the rev was a little stronger it would have gone DCAM, again, IMHO
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 7,960 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>1971 No S

    PR-65 Cameo >>



    well the variety is correct, and the designation is correct, but your wayyyyyyyy off on the grade. >>



    What, too high? image
    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>1971 No S

    PR-65 Cameo >>



    well the variety is correct, and the designation is correct, but your wayyyyyyyy off on the grade. >>



    What, too high? image >>



    imageimageimageimageimage
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>no S variety--aprox 1600 minted
    PR68CAM

    am i close?
    greg >>



    ding ding ding

    I did not expect anyone to get it that quick. This coin was originally in Frank Corso's set until I aquired it in y2k. I fought for a few years to try and get it bumped to 69, IMO this deffinately rates a 69. If the rev was a little stronger it would have gone DCAM, again, IMHO >>



    If it came from Frank Corso, it's definitely a nice coin!


    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • <<If it came from Frank Corso, it's definitely a nice coin!>>

    I agree! I think Frank has the finest collection of Jeffs around. He has both MS and Proofs so that sets him apart from those who only collect one or the other. (I haven't looked or spoke with him for a while, I assume he still has his set!)

    pontiacinf: you let the cat out of the bag too quickly! It is obviously a NO-S but it is hard to grade proofs from photos. I wanted to see more guesses. image
  • pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭


    << <i><<If it came from Frank Corso, it's definitely a nice coin!>>

    I agree! I think Frank has the finest collection of Jeffs around. He has both MS and Proofs so that sets him apart from those who only collect one or the other. (I haven't looked or spoke with him for a while, I assume he still has his set!)

    pontiacinf: you let the cat out of the bag too quickly! It is obviously a NO-S but it is hard to grade proofs from photos. I wanted to see more guesses. image >>



    thanks for pointing out one of my major flaws, Carl image
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    actually, it's rather easy to "guess" this one since it's an obvious Cameo and half of the graded PCGS Cam's are PR68CAM. despite your in-hand assessment that the coin should be a 69 and/or perhaps a DCAM, judging from the picture this coin is safe at the assigned grade and almost certainly won't move up without help. if it were my coin, i'd send it through NCS to clear the fields of any haze while also brightening the overall appearance and protecting the coin for the long haul. then it could be sent in for re-encapsulation at PR68CAM.

    if you've been paying attention lately, there has been a plethora of this variety offered for sale lately. i noticed a couple at eBay several months ago and tried to buy a PCGS PR68CAM from a forum member but slept at the switch a day too long. since then there has been at least 3-4 at eBay, a couple at TeleTrade, several at Heritage including some still in the original Proof Set and even a PCGS PR65DCAM i saw in CW. this is one of those "Rarities that's actually just scarce" and has a demand which seems to make it hard for owners to hold their coins!!! i would be an exception to that rule; when i finally buy one it'll be with me till i croak!!!!image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file