I just got this back from PCGS in BB for Altered Surface. Does anyone have an opinion why? Any suggestions on how to get it into a slab? Any guess on grade is welcome. Thanks.
Is that a bit of PVC residue about the date and to the right of United on the reverse. If so, I believe you can use acetone to get the off without harming the coin/finish. Then back it goes for a plastic holder and MS63.
bob
Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
Wouldn't polished come back as cleaned? I don't think it is polished but I am still trying to figure out what I am looking for.
The acetone, I see that it has been mentioned and debated. Some say that the coin has been cleaned by using acetone. Will acetone do anything to the mint luster or to the coin surface? Do I just dab or soak? How much or how long? Never done it before and any tips are welcome.
Acetone (be sure it's pure and not 99%) will not harm the luster or coin in any way. Experiment, but a good soak of a minute or so might do the trick. Acetone evaporates very quickly and will not leave a trace. Ventilate the area. There are others here on the board that have more experience with acetone than me and perhaps they will chime in. bob
Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
I bought the coin about 13 years ago from a coin store. I bought a Capital Plastics (three pane hard plastic) dollar holder for it at the same time. It has not been out of the holder until it's recent trip to PCGS. I do not know if this helps but here is the history I have. It would be nice if PCGS would have given an explanation as to what they think is wrong. It looks like they used Altered Surface as a generic term to mean they do not like it but won't call it cleaned.
I have seen this on DMPLs with PVC damage (not presence of PVC but damage from it). Cannot tell from your image though. If PVC is dipped off and the surface was already corrupted, there is not turning it around.
You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
Maybe this explains my view of "Altered Surface" from this thread..
It was returned by PCGS last year as Altered Surface as well. I sent it to NCS, they did what they do and put it in an NGC Slab in a decent grade. I guess PCGS now agrees.
Herein lies my issue with "Altered Surface". What does that mean?
"......altered Surfaces" designation on it. Instead, they are providing a useful service to the submitter: rather than just saying "DNC" and leaving it at that, PCGS is telling the submitter why the coin did not cross.
Ok, better than just DNC, but still ambiguous. Is it always something that can be removed, like some sort of residue? Hence the trip to NCS took care of it. Or can it be something more perminent? Stains, 'milk spots', etc.
Would be nice to know exactly what the graders spotted.
From another thread I replied to: I too have been hit with the 'Altered Surface' BB from PCGS. I wish they would be more specific than that.
PCGS' definition: 94|N-4 Altered Surface - Whizzed, harsh cleaning, thumped over (using a pasty substance to alter the appearance).
Whizzed & harsh cleaning shuld be easy to see, so my guess would be 'thumbed over', but it's anybody's guess. Personally, for the cost of grading & having the coin BB'ed, the least we should get is a better explaination why the coin was determined to have 'altered Surfaces'.
And lastly, from still another thread: Although this may never happen either, i wish PCGS would comment on why they think a coin should be BB. Sure, there are the obvious signs of cleaning, but I just got a slabbed coin (by 1 of the other 2-3 top TPG) coming back for 'Altered Surface'. I wish they would explain what PCGS saw that the other's missed. Might be a good lesson to learn for the money spent.
Yup, sent a few coins in that came back BB'ed for "Altered Surface"
Wish I was more help, those 'spots' worry me, but can't really tell what they are. I would look at the coin under different lighting, sometime faint hairlines show up better with different lighting. Take a loup & slowly go around the coin at different angles, also looking for PVC. What do you think of the luster?
If you really want it in a PCGS slab, and you just can't find anything wrong, maybe a dip in Acetone & resubmisstion will work?
Comments
My grade guess is either ms63 or ms64.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
use acetone to get the off without harming the coin/finish. Then back it goes for a plastic holder and MS63.
bob
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
The acetone, I see that it has been mentioned and debated. Some say that the coin has been cleaned by using acetone. Will acetone do anything to the mint luster or to the coin surface? Do I just dab or soak? How much or how long? Never done it before and any tips are welcome.
Thanks for the help.
soak of a minute or so might do the trick. Acetone evaporates very quickly and will
not leave a trace. Ventilate the area. There are others here on the board that have more experience
with acetone than me and perhaps they will chime in.
bob
For a large selection of U.S. Coins & Currency, visit The Reeded Edge's online webstore at the link below.
The Reeded Edge
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
Give her a bath in acetone and take her to town
<< <i>Pictures can be difficult to judge, but maybe the coin has been overdipped. >>
I concur
Wrong
" From the spotting,I would guess a bad acid dip has eaten into the sufaces."
Very wrong.
" Nice coin. Give her a bath in acetone and take her to town."
RIGHT!
It was returned by PCGS last year as Altered Surface as well. I sent it to NCS, they did what they do and put it in an NGC Slab in a decent grade. I guess PCGS now agrees.
Herein lies my issue with "Altered Surface".
What does that mean?
"......altered Surfaces" designation on it. Instead, they are providing a useful service to the submitter: rather than just saying "DNC" and leaving it at that, PCGS is telling the submitter why the coin did not cross.
Ok, better than just DNC, but still ambiguous.
Is it always something that can be removed, like some sort of residue? Hence the trip to NCS took care of it.
Or can it be something more perminent? Stains, 'milk spots', etc.
Would be nice to know exactly what the graders spotted.
From another thread I replied to:
I too have been hit with the 'Altered Surface' BB from PCGS.
I wish they would be more specific than that.
PCGS' definition:
94|N-4 Altered Surface - Whizzed, harsh cleaning, thumped over (using a pasty substance to alter the appearance).
Whizzed & harsh cleaning shuld be easy to see, so my guess would be 'thumbed over', but it's anybody's guess.
Personally, for the cost of grading & having the coin BB'ed, the least we should get is a better explaination why the coin was determined to have 'altered Surfaces'.
And lastly, from still another thread:
Although this may never happen either, i wish PCGS would comment on why they think a coin should be BB.
Sure, there are the obvious signs of cleaning, but I just got a slabbed coin (by 1 of the other 2-3 top TPG) coming back for 'Altered Surface'.
I wish they would explain what PCGS saw that the other's missed.
Might be a good lesson to learn for the money spent.
Yup, sent a few coins in that came back BB'ed for "Altered Surface"
Wish I was more help, those 'spots' worry me, but can't really tell what they are.
I would look at the coin under different lighting, sometime faint hairlines show up better with different lighting.
Take a loup & slowly go around the coin at different angles, also looking for PVC.
What do you think of the luster?
If you really want it in a PCGS slab, and you just can't find anything wrong, maybe a dip in Acetone & resubmisstion will work?