Home U.S. Coin Forum

1985

ChrisRxChrisRx Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭✭
My birthyear... but, no coins minted that year of any true raritiy and or beauty =( (please prove me wrong!)
image

Comments

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,149 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well, considering this is a lightside forum, you're right.
  • MisterBungleMisterBungle Posts: 2,308 ✭✭✭

    If we could only post 'rare' coins here, a lot of us
    would be buggered!!

    The only coin I have from '85.

    image

    ~


    "America suffers today from too much pluribus and not enough unum.".....Arthur Schlesinger Jr.

  • mattnissmattniss Posts: 742 ✭✭✭✭
    Great birth year! As an '85 baby myself, I have to agree.
  • ChrisRxChrisRx Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>If we could only post 'rare' coins here, a lot of us >>



    Then post someone elses... ANYTHING =(
    image
  • jhusmanjhusman Posts: 1,082
    I have the same problem - born in 73, nothing good. I've been buying World proof sets for a while now, and it is becoming a pretty cool set.
  • OneCentOneCent Posts: 3,561


    << <i>I have the same problem - born in 73, nothing good. I've been buying World proof sets for a while now, and it is becoming a pretty cool set. >>



    That's not true...How about a high-grade 1973-P Ike in MS66? Beautiful coin and conditionally scarce in MS66. If I had one I'd post it.

    image
    imageimage
    Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
    ANA Member R-3147111
  • ChrisRxChrisRx Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭✭
    HEY! Lets keep the topic on 1985 , Thanks =)

    Come on.... show someone elses 1985 at least!
    image
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Felling really old in this thread... You could do a 1985 Error Type Set or a 100 year prior 1885 type set as both would be quite challenging. image
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,702 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1985 is a very underrated year for US coins. It's a little boring since
    there aren't a lot of major varieties but there are enough to keep it
    interesting.

    It's the first year that the miunt had the problems with the copper
    plated zinc cents mostly solved. There were still lots of coins with
    bubbles and peels and large percentages of the coins have very un-
    attractive surfaces but very nice choice and superb gems can be
    found in mint sets with a little effort. Some of these will even ap-
    pear as dramatic PL's but these will take more effort. Prices are
    quite nominal since demand is low.

    Nickels are a little more interesting. These come extremely nice and
    are commonly PL but they are difficult to find without marking (and FS).
    The Philly issue is tougher and appears as a superb gem in only about
    every 300th mint set. If you're contemplating buying an 1804 dollar
    this may seem about as common as dirt but in real life, it's a very tough
    coin. Large percentages of these sets have disappeared over the last
    22 years and most of the coins are simply lost. They had no value even
    as superb gems until recently so many just got pushed into a Jefferson
    nickel folder or spent. Even if it didn't get a big thumbprint or a rub from
    a folder or album it's the type of collection that owners are often advised
    by dealers to "just spend". The remaining sets won't all survive either.
    These sets are still being "consumed" enmass by the general public. You
    can't just go on eBay and buy all these since they are often unavailable
    now days.

    Dimes are less interesting but neither is common in high grade. The Den-
    ver isn't too tough but the Philly is a little harder. These come as nice PL's
    as well. Rolls are improbable and condition in rolls is poor for this date.
    One of the best die pairs striking the Philly coins always has a deep short
    gouge right in front of the portrait.

    Quarter are my favorite for this date. This is the first year that all quarters
    have the type "d" reverse but a few of the Philly coins have a distinct ob-
    verse. This is the "small bust" coin and is most easily seen in the distance
    between the "E" of "LIBERTY" and the bust. It is much greater on the small
    bust. It is "common" in circulation (~1: 200) but is a bear in grades over VF.
    Uncs are very scarce. This date is one of the more available clad quarters
    in rolls but that just means there are very few out there. Worse, by far, is
    that almost all these coins were set aside by very few entities. Unfortunately
    none of the small bust coins appear in the coins set aside by these entities.
    The only source with which I'm familiar is a private mint set with a statue of
    liberty medal in it. They are scarce enough in these sets that there may be
    no more than a couple dozen issued and these may mostly have been "con-
    sumed". Gems of the more common variety are interesting as well. I haven't
    seen enough rolls to have an opinion on their availabilty from this source but
    they are tough in the sets. Only about 1% are spectacular.

    Half dollars are similar to the quarters but tougher yet. Finding these with
    nice clean shields is a job.

    Proofs come really nice for this date. It is just about the best year (especially
    for an average). I haven't looked at enough to have an opinion on PR-70's
    but really nice coins account for around 3% of the coins from sets.

    If you really want a challenge try finding an original mint set with all the coins
    gem. You can always take a Philly package from one set and a Denver from
    another to make it much easier. You may as well do the same with the proof
    set. I believe there are three private issue mint sets you can add. Of course
    there's the souvenir set too, but trying to find choice souvenir and private
    sets is an exercise in futility. They are scarce enough to stand on their own
    anyway.

    It really is a good date even if there are some better ones nearby.


    Tempus fugit.
  • ChrisRxChrisRx Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for that info Cladking
    image
  • jmski52jmski52 Posts: 23,091 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If I had been born in '85, I'd be putting together the nicest high-grade set (in PCGS plastic), including Cameo Proofs that I could put my hands on. The fact that they are available now at reasonable prices makes it that much more interesting, because in my experience - things never stay static. That era of coins is just old enough to be showing some attrition, and once it is recognised, they never get any cheaper. Good Luck!image
    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
  • PCGS price guide lists 1985 Kennedy Half in MS-70 DCAM as 525...........


    Thats kinda rare ???

    Sorry I have no pics for ya......


    AL
  • ChrisRxChrisRx Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭✭
    Guess this is my key:

    image
    image
  • How 'bout a proof Linc?

    image
  • RBinTexRBinTex Posts: 4,328
    cladking,

    you'd use half the lines if you had ones twice as wide. image
  • MidLifeCrisisMidLifeCrisis Posts: 10,550 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Guess this is my key >>


    That's a nice coin ChrisRx. image

    Sheesh, I'm old...I graduated high school in 1985. image
  • ChrisRxChrisRx Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭✭
    Nice Lincoln.... If anyone wants to sell.... I have an ad on BST
    image
  • BarbercoinBarbercoin Posts: 1,032 ✭✭✭
    Thanks Cladking for the "101" class in '85

    Very interesting; nice job! image

    WTB: Barber Quarters XF

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,702 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My pleasure guys.

    I have a hard time
    reading the wider
    lines, so try not to
    write them. image
    Tempus fugit.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file