Home U.S. Coin Forum

Comments

  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 7,958 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think you're right about the hits...also, I don't think the bottom step is complete...

    --Christian
    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    judging solely from the picture i would say the weakness of the fourth step is the concern and not the faint contact marks on the fifth step.
  • I doubt you'd get it with the hits.
    My humble '63 mint registry set, not much, but it's mine!
  • I agree with keets. Looks like the 4th step is not all there as it may be bridged under columns 2 and 3. PCGS requires at least 5 full steps for the FS designation.
  • I'd say you got a FS. image
    OLDER IS BETTER

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file