Did anyone see Milton Bradley yesterday?
kcballboy
Posts: 1,405 ✭✭✭
in Sports Talk
What a moron. Hurts his knee when his own manager tosses him to the ground for being a dip$hit. I still can't believe the Royals traded for him earlier in the year.
Travis
0
Comments
Now, NONE OF THIS is my view or opinion. Is is JUST what I heard in a radio report today. I saw none of this happen and did not know about it until the radio report.
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
But that doesn't give the ump the right to bait him. I'd like to know exactly what the ump said.
Looks like the 1st base coach and the opposing 1st baseman are also saying the ump was baiting Bradley..if so..fire his ass!
<< <i>Sighhhhhhhhhh......I'm sure will hear the race card being played somehow ad nauseum!! >>
Sighhhhhhhhhhh......well you just made sure we all heard about it first didn't you?
<< <i>Milton Bradley's persona should come as no surprise. He carries baggage and it's a well-known fact. >>
You would too if your parents named you Milton
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
any good puns regarding his name? maybe his middle name should be "Sorry"
It was always entertaining when the Tribe had this clown and CoCo Crisp.... I was embarassed by their ridiculous names lol.
Video Link
If this were his first case of stupidity I would be more inclined to sympathize for him, but since he's a proven malcontent I don't feel bad for the guy.
<< <i>If this were his first case of stupidity I would be more inclined to sympathize for him, but since he's a proven malcontent I don't feel bad for the guy. >>
100%
<< <i>My brain function is telling me that as a professional getting paid millions, Bradley should have the maturity to shut up and play the game. >>
True, but people pay to watch him... The ol' saying is that nobody pays to watch the umpires. They are simply supposed to do their jobs and not get into verbal battles with players. If what's being said is true, the ump was interrupting a player and the game by making comments. This has a potential effect on the outcome of the game IMO. If an ump makes an argument personal, he may make calls against a player/team simply because of that. Further, in this case, he got a player to react and then the player was subsequently injured while a manager attempted to restrain him. Bradley may be an idiot with a history, but the umpire isn't being paid to fight with players. If he continued to instigate Bradley, he should be suspended.
<< <i>what's being said is true, the ump was interrupting a player >>
From what I heard, Bradley is the one who started talking.. Telling the ump that he didn't throw the bat.
If that's true, Bradley keeps his mouth shut and nothing happens.
<< <i>Is it just me, or do you come to the defense of every douche bag in professional sports? LOL just an observation.. first "The Dog Whisperer/killer/rapist Vick" and now this bozo. Perhaps this incident WAS a result of umpire baiting, but Bradley is widely recognized AND criticized for being a negative, injury prone, cancerous lesion of a player. >>
I hope you're talking about Ax and not me.
<< <i>From what I heard, Bradley is the one who started talking.. Telling the ump that he didn't throw the bat.
If that's true, Bradley keeps his mouth shut and nothing happens >>
I've heard different stories already, but me stance remains the same. Even if a player tries to argue with them, they need to ignore him unless he's breaking the rules. If that's the case, kick his a$$ out instead of arguing with him during the middle of the game.
<< <i>lol yes dirtmoney. we are talking about axhole >>
I almost had to go postal on your arse
Per the SD Tribune, he called Bradley, “(bleeping) piece of (expletive).”
Guess the truth hurt Bradley's feelings and then he threw a temper tantrum, which resulted in a torn ACL.
<< <i>Winters was suspended for using profanity.
Per the SD Tribune, he called Bradley, “(bleeping) piece of (expletive).”
Guess the truth hurt Bradley's feelings and then he threw a temper tantrum, which resulted in a torn ACL. >>
The ump was still in the wrong, but the outcome is almost as funny as the player that hurt himself while celebrating.
<< <i>The ump was still in the wrong >>
I agree with you 100%.
Regardless of what Bradley said to instigate the whole thing, Winters should have just brushed off the comments and kept his mouth shut.
<< <i>Regardless of what Bradley said to instigate the whole thing, Winters should have just brushed off the comments and kept his mouth shut. >>
But Bradley isn't said to have said anything, only the ump.
The ump was clearly out of line and this is why he's done for the year - and deservedly so.
Good for Bradley.
<< <i>
<< <i>Regardless of what Bradley said to instigate the whole thing, Winters should have just brushed off the comments and kept his mouth shut. >>
But Bradley isn't said to have said anything, only the ump.
The ump was clearly out of line and this is why he's done for the year - and deservedly so.
Good for Bradley. >>
not true, badley talked first.
http://sportsfansnews.com/author/andy-fischer/
y
<< <i>But Bradley isn't said to have said anything, only the ump. >>
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Actual game footage link
Go to 00:37 and Bradley is mouthing off the entire time.
Another example of Tinkerbell revising history to fit her agenda
<< <i>
<< <i>But Bradley isn't said to have said anything, only the ump. >>
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Actual game footage link
Go to 00:37 and Bradley is mouthing off the entire time.
Another example of Tinkerbell revising history to fit her agenda >>
ALWAYS! ALWAYS! ALWAYS! Has to just go against the tide to be difficult!
<< <i>
But Bradley isn't said to have said anything, only the ump.
>>
Why don't you guys ever, ever read? I clearly stated he 'isn't said to have said anything', clearly different from stating 'he didn't say anything'.
Christ you guys are pathetic.
learn to admit when you are wrong.
http://sportsfansnews.com/author/andy-fischer/
y
<< <i>talking in circles isnt making you look any more right.
learn to admit when you are wrong. >>
All I said is that it was said that Bradley didn't say anything to start it...I didn't say he didn't!
Nobody is 'talking in circles' here...just people like you and your ilk who would rather point fingers than actually READ.
I read that just fine. You can play with the meaning of that sentence as much as you want, but you will always be wrong.
what words did i miss read?
http://sportsfansnews.com/author/andy-fischer/
y
I'll break it down for those slow to comprehend: it's means that initial reports indicated Bradley didn't say anything.
There, got it now? Good!
Oh well...anyone who's been reading this thread and has basic English skills knows what was said.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
http://sportsfansnews.com/author/andy-fischer/
y
<< <i>I like how stownie tries to derail the topic once he's seen he made a mistake (yet again). >>
Huh?!?
No, it's proving that once again you attempt to change context of what you say after YOU are proven wrong.
As usual.
He didn't say what he thought he did say but in actuality he didn't say when he did say that he didn't say a word.
I posted that the initial reports stated he didn't say anything to the ump (my post stating 'its said that he didn't say anything')
I then posted that the ump was tossed (rightfully so) for the rest of the season.
Then you all piled on for some unknown reason, perhaps its all part of the same sickness in which you stalk everything I post, who knows.
All I know is what I said was accurate, that I didn't state that Bradley didn't say anything first, and I know you guys need to get over me already.
I am done in this thread, no matter how many more lies and mistruths you post about what i said.
http://sportsfansnews.com/author/andy-fischer/
y
<< <i>But Bradley isn't said to have said anything, only the ump. >>
Gee, I wonder why...
Probably because it changes the entire context of your statement.
Just admit you were wrong, as usual, and move on.
<< <i>Why do teams continue signing this clown? >>
There is no possible way he is on an MLB team once his current contract expires - NO POSSIBLE WAY - NONE!!
In fact, you heightened his image by honoring him as a clown.