Look at all those body bags!!!

I was browsing the "Shared Orders" page 1 and once again found 2 horrible submissions(not mine).
We're talking ~50% BB's on these submissions.
Don't these submitters have a clue that they are sending in crap?
Are they buying from guys like Topline and just hoping something sticks???
11 out of 24
12 out of 22
We're talking ~50% BB's on these submissions.
Don't these submitters have a clue that they are sending in crap?
Are they buying from guys like Topline and just hoping something sticks???
11 out of 24
12 out of 22
0
Comments
<< <i>uhh, topline who? >>
eBay seller out of Texas who lists a lot of raw stuff.
Russ, NCNE
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
The money thus wasted by coin buyers might be half or more of the total they spend on coins. In these circumstances, buying rusted Desoto hubcaps would be wiser.
<< <i>The money thus wasted by coin buyers might be half or more of the total they spend on coins. In these circumstances, buying rusted Desoto hubcaps would be wiser. >>
That reminds me. In my youth I used to take the chrome (and similar) from the junked old cars at the scrapyard thinking they would be worth a bit of money to restorers in the future. Forgot whatever happened to that cache.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
<< <i>I was browsing the "Shared Orders" page 1 and once again found 2 horrible submissions(not mine).
We're talking ~50% BB's on these submissions.
Don't these submitters have a clue that they are sending in crap?
Are they buying from guys like Topline and just hoping something sticks???
11 out of 24
12 out of 22 >>
Why are you looking at the bodybag ratio? Look at what was submitted in those orders. Other than perhaps the 1886 5c, was there really anything that really needed some company's opinion as to grade or authenticity? No! (And worse, the 1886 got BB'd for something which occurred at the mint, not after the coin left it! Not in any sense can this be claimed to be the submitter's fault.) There's no good reason these coins were submitted, and suggests that the submitters allowed themselves to succumb to certain pro-slab propaganda. And the grading services had no problem with this either. (And that's being nice to the companies.) Slabbing companies _really_ should send to (apparent) first time submitters (or more precisely, those showing desires to become a submitter) some sort of notice that first-time submitters should seriously consider going through a dealer/knowledgeable collector first, rather than blindly sending their coins. It certainly makes one wonder just how much more the companies care about money than they do about coins.
</rant off>
Ed. S.
(EJS)
"Are you telling me that 200 of our men against your boy is a no win situation for us?"
"You send in that many; don't forget one thing."
"What?"
"A good supply of body bags."
--First Blood, 1982
<< <i>
<< <i>I was browsing the "Shared Orders" page 1 and once again found 2 horrible submissions(not mine).
We're talking ~50% BB's on these submissions.
Don't these submitters have a clue that they are sending in crap?
Are they buying from guys like Topline and just hoping something sticks???
11 out of 24
12 out of 22 >>
Why are you looking at the bodybag ratio? Look at what was submitted in those orders. Other than perhaps the 1886 5c, was there really anything that really needed some company's opinion as to grade or authenticity? No! (And worse, the 1886 got BB'd for something which occurred at the mint, not after the coin left it! Not in any sense can this be claimed to be the submitter's fault.) There's no good reason these coins were submitted, and suggests that the submitters allowed themselves to succumb to certain pro-slab propaganda. And the grading services had no problem with this either. (And that's being nice to the companies.) Slabbing companies _really_ should send to (apparent) first time submitters (or more precisely, those showing desires to become a submitter) some sort of notice that first-time submitters should seriously consider going through a dealer/knowledgeable collector first, rather than blindly sending their coins. It certainly makes one wonder just how much more the companies care about money than they do about coins.
</rant off> >>
Nice post post Aegis
I agree, why submit these marginal coins in the first place.......
I like your term, "pro-slab propaganda".......not really sure of this submitter's intentions!!!!
<< <i>Slabbing companies _really_ should send to (apparent) first time submitters (or more precisely, those showing desires to become a submitter) some sort of notice that first-time submitters should seriously consider going through a dealer/knowledgeable collector first, rather than blindly sending their coins. It certainly makes one wonder just how much more the companies care about money than they do about coins. >>
Shouldn't PCGS or any TPG for that matter be able to assume that the customer has at least some rudimentary knowledge about coins, grades and the slabbing process? How often do see comments here about certain raw coins being bought or sold and why isn't it slabbed? People have become so infused with the hype about why isn't it slabbed that they apparently just submit anything and everything.
if you look he/she submits a lot of coins since 2001