Home› Sports Talk

KC Chiefs - Abysmal

stitzenstitzen Posts: 1,771
in Sports Talk
How exactly do they score just 3 points against that terrible Texans defense? Ugh, what a terrible performance.

Why does LJ only get 10 carries? What a debacle.

Comments

  • MichiganMichigan Posts: 4,942 ✭


    << <i>How exactly do they score just 3 points against that terrible Texans defense? Ugh, what a terrible performance.

    Why does LJ only get 10 carries? What a debacle. >>




    Bad coaching decisions?
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    The Falcons just called. They want Schaub back.
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,694 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Texans are an improving team and better than people think. Adding Green and Schwaub to complement Johnson gives them a fairly respectable offense.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • stitzenstitzen Posts: 1,771
    They still have no offensive line and all the talent in the world won't help them be respectable until that line holds.
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,694 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Line did very well today...only giving up 2 sacks and Houston rushed for over 100 yds. I'm sure if you took a poll before the game and asked which of these two teams would rush for over 100 yds today, almost no one would have said Houston.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • gosteelersgosteelers Posts: 2,668 ✭✭✭
    This outcome shouldn't surprise anyone. The Chiefs are looking at 3-13 this year. Houston definitely has some talent on the defensive side of the ball.
  • iamthegreatcornholioiamthegreatcornholio Posts: 3,366
    KC hasn't exactly been a powerhouse. Schaub is used to getting rid of the ball quick in the west coast offense days - he was sacked twice today.

    Getting rid of him was pure genius.










    image
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭


    << <i>KC hasn't exactly been a powerhouse. Schaub is used to getting rid of the ball quick in the west coast offense days - he was sacked twice today.

    Getting rid of him was pure genius. >>

    Well, the Falcons didn't know they were going to be dogged with so many problems in the off-season.
  • iamthegreatcornholioiamthegreatcornholio Posts: 3,366


    << <i> Well, the Falcons didn't know they were going to be dogged with so many problems in the off-season. >>



    True, but when you have a QB that takes as many hits as Vick did, you'd better have a decent backup after getting almost nothing for Schaub, they went looking for losers and found Harrington... they gambled and lost. I'm thinking Petrino will trade the 1st pick in the '08 draft because he wants Brohm.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    Funny how bandwagoner "fans" pile on other teams while their alleged "favorite" team is competing for the worst record in the NFL, again.

    image

    Edited to add:

    The Sucks 0-1
    The Texans 1-0

    image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • stitzenstitzen Posts: 1,771
    24-56

    What's that? Oh it's the texan's miserable lifetime franchise winning percentage...a mind-blowing .300.

  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>24-56

    What's that? Oh it's the texan's miserable lifetime franchise winning percentage...a mind-blowing .300. >>



    And.. eh hem.. "your" bandwagon team even had a MORE miserable first five year "winning percentage...a mind-blowing" .294.

    And this year isn't getting any better for your flavor of the month.

    Sucks 0-1
    Texans 1-0

    BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Owned again and again and again and again.

    image

    Edited: Typo.. I blame it on the numerous beers I had while watching MY home team, in MY stadium (my tax $ do pay for it), and in MY home town image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • stitzenstitzen Posts: 1,771
    stown what happened to your promise to only post in the texans thread, lies lies lies yeah.

  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>24-56

    What's that? Oh it's the texan's miserable lifetime franchise winning percentage...a mind-blowing .300. >>



    And.. eh hem.. "your" bandwagon team even had a MORE miserable first five year "winning percentage...a mind-blowing" .294.

    And this year isn't getting any better for your flavor of the month.

    Sucks 0-1
    Texans 1-0

    BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Owned again and again and again and again.

    image

    Edited: Typo.. I blame it on the numerous beers I had while watching MY home team, in MY stadium (my tax $ do pay for it), and in MY home town image

    Real edit: Just because image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • stitzenstitzen Posts: 1,771


    << <i>As long as axtell remains, I will no longer be an active participant, period.

    I'll occasionally come on to check PMs, give props due in the Sports Cards & Memorabilia Forum, and post pictures in the Texans thread since some appreciate it. >>

  • RCGuyRCGuy Posts: 161
    Texan's need to string 5+ wins together before they stop being the laughing stock of the NFL draft.
  • stitzenstitzen Posts: 1,771
    Texans passed on *both* reggie bush and vince young?

    bwahaha

  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Texan's need to string 5+ wins together before they stop being the laughing stock of the NFL draft. >>


    image
  • RCGuyRCGuy Posts: 161
    Texans should have picked V. Young

    OR


    traded their #1 pick for a handfull of lower picks. Good ol' Mario would have still been available at #10 - #15.
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭


    << <i>traded their #1 pick for a handfull of lower picks. Good ol' Mario would have still been available at #10 - #15. >>

    Huh? The general consensus was that he was at least the #3 pick behind Young and Bush.
  • RCGuyRCGuy Posts: 161
    Huh?

    no it wasn't
  • stitzenstitzen Posts: 1,771
    So they give #1 draft pick money to Mario when they could have had a legit #1 in VY or Bush?

    Just the texans being the texans, the same reason they'll be the doormat of the league forever.
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭


    << <i>So they give #1 draft pick money to Mario when they could have had a legit #1 in VY or Bush? >>

    That may well be true; time will tell. I'm not saying Williams was a good first pick, but he sure as hell wasn't a #10-15 pick as being claimed. By the time the combines were done and his stock rose he was a solid #3 at least in most analysts' mock draft.
  • FifthScaleRacerFifthScaleRacer Posts: 173
    Mario Williams #8

    http://www.betus.com/sports-betting/2006_Mock_NFL_Draft-1473.aspx

    Mario wasn't a top 3 project until news leaked that the Texans would pick him.
  • FifthScaleRacerFifthScaleRacer Posts: 173
    Mario at #5

    http://ezinearticles.com/?2006-NFL-Mock-Draft-Top-Five-Value-Picks&id=182442

    All those other lists with Mario at #1 were edited after news broke out.
Sign In or Register to comment.