Opinion on PSA Reviews

I have a Gaylord Perry 1962 PSA 7 rookie that I am pretty sure will grade an 8 if i was to crack it and resubmit it. However, I am scared that if i do that it will come back as a nightmare not holdered or another 7. So i want to hear opinions on what amount of success you all have had on sending cards graded by PSA in holders for review. I would be sending the card in with a minimum grade request of 8 but don't want to waste my money if PSA is known for not bumping up a grade. I'll add a scan in tomorrow. Thanks.
mathew
mathew
baseball & hockey junkie
drugs of choice
NHL hall of fame rookies
drugs of choice
NHL hall of fame rookies
0
Comments
My ebay listings
Learned my lesson the Hard way. I had 18 each 1966 Batman Black Bat, part of a larger order of mostly 9's. These 18 came back as NM-MT 8's. I knew they were all clear perfect 9's. Complained to Linda (At PSA) and since they owed me for something else (A major Mechanical error on a big order), sent them all back for review. All 18 came back exactly the same NM-MT 8's. Took the same 18 cards cracked them out and resubmitted them cold with no history and got 13 9's out of it. PSA wil not and has never admitted that their Graders could be wrong. Review is a Giant waste of money. Crack and Re-Submit !!!!!
Neil
<< <i>PSA wil not and has never admitted that their Graders could be wrong. >>
not true but it is the case 99.99% of the time
<< <i><< PSA wil not and has never admitted that their Graders could be wrong. >>
not true but it is the case 99.99% of the time >>
True, but unless you're the 1% that is an auction house, crack them out!
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's