1951-S and 1956-P franklins opinions please

coinsarefun

Just got them in the mail today.
Is the 1956-P AT or NT?
I like the 1951-S rim color . Anyone have any other opinions on them? I tried to capture the luster.

clarkbar04

56 NT also looks like some neat rev doubling from your pic (look at RICA), 51-s I dig the rim toning but it looks like it has a rev wipe, both on and below the bell, or or is an AU.

coinsarefun

<< <i>56 NT also looks like some neat rev doubling from your pic (look at RICA), 51-s I dig the rim toning but it looks like it has a rev wipe, both on and below the bell, or or is an AU. >>







Can you provide a link for me?
I think its strike doubling

SkyMan

The toning looks NT on both of them. Not worth slabbing either of them. They both are both fun coins.

bushmaster8

Hi Stephanie!

56 looks NT, and I like it...probably envelope toned. It also looks to be a BugsBunny. (The teeth on 56 Bugs are always far less dramatic than the 51, 54, and 55's)

51-S could be a slider, but hard to judge that from a pic. I'd say either AU58 or MS63.

21Walker

Both look NT to me and the 56 is definitely a bugs bunny variety ( I have one just like it) and forget about FBL's. Nice coins............Rick

clarkbar04

<< <i>Can you provide a link for me?
I think its strike doubling >>



I'm sure it is strike doubling, but still cool in my book.

What do you want a link to?

I try to refrain from excessive linking.

STONE

Nice colors