Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Ridiculous

This is the second Memory Lane auction that I have posted a problem about the grade given. The top border looks jagged, and the bottom left corner is weak. If this is a PSA 9, then I have a whole box of 1958's to re-check.

Link

Comments

  • julen23julen23 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭
    early graded card, hence older label.

    don't know anything abou this year, corner does look soft however, but scans can lie.

    j
    image
    RIP GURU
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,838 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a PSA 8 to me, but as julen said, scans can be misleading.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • CDsNutsCDsNuts Posts: 10,092
    I would actually expect a 7 if I saw this card raw. Bottom left is more than touched, bottom right is touched. The top border doesn't bother me, but on corner wear alone the card should not even be considered close to a 9.
  • rube26105rube26105 Posts: 10,225 ✭✭
    augggh,the pic is gone now!
    the rube
  • Why is this a memory lane auction problem? If there's a discrepancy with the grade, shouldn't the ire be directed at PSA instead?

  • 1960toppsguy1960toppsguy Posts: 1,127 ✭✭
    classic example of an earlier PSA over graded cardimage
  • WeekendHackerWeekendHacker Posts: 1,460 ✭✭✭


    << <i>augggh,the pic is gone now!
    the rube >>


    go back to the site and scroll to the right, the page is mis-alined.
  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    I don't know how many times I have seen cards with that flip and thought things were a little off??
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
    Top border looks fine. However, 3 out of 4 corners look lightly touched. It'd look more natural as an 8.


    If you reduce the image size a bit, it doesn't look so bad though.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • gemintgemint Posts: 6,178 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's been noted numerous times that the holders of this vintage do not indicate overgrading. I submitted thousands of cards during that era and they were at least as stringent at grading as they are today. That was the time when the 'grader of death' frequently reared his ugly head. In fact, for 70s material, they are more lax today. 10s were very tough to get back then. Now I'm disappointed if I submit post 1971 cards and don't get at least one 10 on my submission.

    On the other hand, I am careful with the very old style fonts that contained the David Hall collection. Those appear to have more generously graded examples. But there will always be examples of overgraded cards in every label type. These are the cards that typically get recirculated for sale while the stronger examples are usually kept in collections more long term.
Sign In or Register to comment.