Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Recent Submission Results

Just got the results of my recent submission. It was the membership renewal. The min size requirement on the 68 OPC Stargells is killing me. If there is a short cut card on a sheet, doesn't logic dictate there would be one on the sheet that is oversized? Pretty pleased with the Venezuelans.


1 90652839 1962 POST CANADIAN 173 ROBERTO CLEMENTE HAND CUT 4
2 90652840 1968 O-PEE-CHEE 86 WILLIE STARGELL N/A Not Holdered, Did not meet Minimum Size Requirements
2 90652841 1968 O-PEE-CHEE 86 WILLIE STARGELL N/A Not Holdered, Did not meet Minimum Size Requirements
3 90652842 1966 VENEZUELA TOPPS 99 BUC BELTERS W.STARGELL/D.CLENDENON 4
4 90652843 1968 VENEZUELA TOPPS 86 WILLIE STARGELL N/A 3
5 90652844 1967 VENEZUELA TOPPS 280 WILLIE STARGELL N/A 4

Date Received: 06/28/2007
Date of Grades Posted: 07/10/2007
Date Shipped: No Date Specified


Comments

  • Nice grades on the Venezuelans!

    I know what you mean on the OPC's and minimum size requirements. It's not like OPC were aces in the cutting department. I have an Eddie Murray rookie card that is nicely centered and pulled fresh from a pack by yours truly, that is at least a 9 - if not for the size problem. image
    << image >>
  • kimo75kimo75 Posts: 263 ✭✭
    The 2 Stargells are 8s or 9s easy. I have 2 others in in another submission that keep getting kicked back as trimmed. Who in their right mind would trim a card that was already small? I'm trying to wear them out by submitting over and over. I'll get 2 free vouchers and try again.
Sign In or Register to comment.