86-87 Fleer: worth it to submit for grading? -- GRADES POSTED

I'm a coin guy and know little about the current state of affairs with cards. I have an 86-87 Fleer Basketball set (complete, with stickers). The set is raw, but I was attentive to quality when putting it together in the 1980s. The Jordan was pulled from a pack (pack cost me $125 back in the day...). Would it be worth the time, effort, and money to submit this set or parts of it for grading? Would I be able to get more than $1000 for the set (after fees) if I submitted? If so, to whom should I submit? I understand there is BGS and PSA, which is the one to go with? I have complete 87-88 and 88-89 sets, but I think they don't have as high a value, so they would likely be OK raw, right? I appreciate any insight.
0
Comments
It would be worth it grading the set. You would make money!!!
<< <i>I'll buy it for $1000 if its in good shape...
It would be worth it grading the set. You would make money!!! >>
Thanks. But tell me more about how that works. I just picked up my first copy of Beckett in about fifteen years. How do I get more than Beckett ask with grading? Got any real-life examples?
1957 Topps PSA
1961 Fleer SGC
<< <i>Forget about values of these cards raw until you get the Jordan and some of the other major stars graded. Any of the top three grading services (PSA/SGC/Beckett) will do a good job on this set. I would defintely hold off on the commons right now because most of them can be obtained graded in NM/MT-Mint condition for about what it cost to have them graded. As far as an idea of what the cards are currently costing or worth go to EBAY and look back at some of the old auctions of the Star cards in different grades. It will give you an idea of their "Market Value". >>
OK, quick look at ebay closed auctions tells me that max value is with PSA, not BGS. Tracking so far?
<< <i>my advice is to scan a few of the stars and post them here......the guys here can give you some idea of the grades..........even an unopened box can have crappy centering or dinged corners which can really affect the grades.....i would leave the commons alone until you have the stars graded...... >>
seems the Jordan would fit into the category of crappy centering! Here's a quick scan I just did:
<< <i>The light chipping along the right side would lend me to believe it's an 8, possibly a 9...great looking card overall though. I know this set does draw out some very tough grading. >>
so let's say it's an 8...worth sending in for grading? (would I be able to get more than $1K for the set if this is what my average card looks like, only centered better?)
I guess if it's a 9, I should send it in, right?
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
<< <i>so let's say it's an 8...worth sending in for grading? (would I be able to get more than $1K for the set if this is what my average card looks like, only centered better?)
I guess if it's a 9, I should send it in, right? >>
If it comes back a 8 and the other key cards are better, you will probably be able to sell the set for $1K:
Recent sale
However, if it comes back a 9, you will EASILY clear $1K with the Jordan going for $850+ Previous sales link
If the Malone, Ewing, Olajuwon, Barkley, etc look better, you will get a bigger bang for your buck, IMO.
Ask goose or someone you trust to send them into PSA for you.
Good luck
<< <i>there is a ton of unopened still out there >>
I actually don't agree with this. There might be some, but you rarely ever see it changing hands anymore. The 87 and 88 sets are much more common.
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
<< <i>you keep referring to beckett. look at past sales on ebay. that will be more in line than beckett. >>
my experience with cardboard was in the late 80s, Beckett was all I knew
sort of like a sports card time capsule I am trying to emerge from!
<< <i>thanks to all for the help so far. Looks like grading the keys with PSA is in order. Never would have thought about the checklist as a key, but if y'all say so. I still have to consult the Beckett that I bought
Yeah, the checklist is a very, very tough card to find in high grade. Last card of the set - typical collector puts them in number order, as well as paying less attention to the checklist.
1957 Topps PSA
1961 Fleer SGC
1957 Topps 99% 7.40 GPA
Hank Aaron Basic PSA 7-8(75%)
<< <i>
<< <i>Forget about values of these cards raw until you get the Jordan and some of the other major stars graded. Any of the top three grading services (PSA/SGC/Beckett) will do a good job on this set. I would defintely hold off on the commons right now because most of them can be obtained graded in NM/MT-Mint condition for about what it cost to have them graded. As far as an idea of what the cards are currently costing or worth go to EBAY and look back at some of the old auctions of the Star cards in different grades. It will give you an idea of their "Market Value". >>
OK, quick look at ebay closed auctions tells me that max value is with PSA, not BGS. Tracking so far? >>
Regardless of what the demagogues will tell you, if you are looking to maximize PROFIT with this set, the only reasonable choice is PSA.
If you are submitting for any other reason, any grading service will suffice.
<< <i>That Jordan will not pull a PSA 9. I think it will be a solid 8. Just grade the Jordan unless any of the key rookies, (Barkely, Malone, Ewing, Thomas, Mullin, Wilkins, Drexler, Olajuwon) Look like solid PSA 9 or 10s. If it was mine I would sell to the member who offered $1000 and not grade any of the cards or deal with ebay fees etc. >>
Allen, heard from PSA on that NNOF yet??????
i like allen's suggestion to sell for $1k to the board member and not deal with ebay fees.
good luck at whatever you decide.
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
<< <i>Allen, heard from PSA on that NNOF yet?????? >>
I sent it to BGS. . . .
Look also at the front for any signs of creases or small dents. The color looks good from the scan.
What does the trade mark look like on the back, concerning the dot pattern.
<< <i>I would grade it a 8 on centering and maybe a 8 on the edges,since some white chipping is showing..Need a scan of the back...I use Beckett, they are tufff Graders.
Look also at the front for any signs of creases or small dents. The color looks good from the scan.
What does the trade mark look like on the back, concerning the dot pattern. >>
couldn't tell you now, paid the USPS around 17 bucks for registered mail this morning. I should know in what, a few weeks?
HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS
<< <i>Your shipment was entered on 07/16/2007. Further processing is pending. >>
sweet...the waiting game is on!
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Forget about values of these cards raw until you get the Jordan and some of the other major stars graded. Any of the top three grading services (PSA/SGC/Beckett) will do a good job on this set. I would defintely hold off on the commons right now because most of them can be obtained graded in NM/MT-Mint condition for about what it cost to have them graded. As far as an idea of what the cards are currently costing or worth go to EBAY and look back at some of the old auctions of the Star cards in different grades. It will give you an idea of their "Market Value". >>
OK, quick look at ebay closed auctions tells me that max value is with PSA, not BGS. Tracking so far? >>
Regardless of what the demagogues will tell you, if you are looking to maximize PROFIT with this set, the only reasonable choice is PSA.
If you are submitting for any other reason, any grading service will suffice. >>
i think to maximize profit for this particular card being the jordan rc i would have chose bgs..a quick completed auctions search on ebay would show bgs gem mints finsish 500.00 dollars more than psa..mint 9 finished around 400.00 higher. when dealing with lower grades though they start to even out. i think for 1980's fleer basketball bgs usually does a bit better. since this is what i mainly collect i keep track of alot of auctions but anyhow good luck!!
1 40665183 1986 FLEER 57 MICHAEL JORDAN N/A 8
2 40665184 1986 FLEER 9 LARRY BIRD N/A 9
3 40665185 1986 FLEER 109 ISIAH THOMAS N/A 8
4 40665186 1986 FLEER 1 KAREEM ABDUL-JABBAR N/A 8
5 40665187 1986 FLEER 68 KARL MALONE N/A 10
6 40665188 1986 FLEER 132 CHECKLIST 1-132 N/A 9
7 40665189 1986 FLEER 7 CHARLES BARKLEY N/A 8
8 40665190 1986 FLEER 32 PATRICK EWING N/A 9
9 40665191 1986 FLEER 121 DOMINIQUE WILKINS N/A 8
10 40665192 1986 FLEER STICKER 8 MICHAEL JORDAN N/A 8
11 40665193 1987 FLEER 59 MICHAEL JORDAN N/A 8
12 40665194 1988 FLEER 17 MICHAEL JORDAN N/A 8
Date Received: 07/16/2007
Date of Grades Posted: 07/24/2007
Date Shipped: 07/24/2007
Bosox1976
<< <i>nice work on those! is the checklist tough? What does a mailman in 10 go for? >>
I heard the checklist was tough and have no clue what it or the Malone in 10 would go for.
I'm kind of pleased with the results because I put this set together raw (along with 87-88, 88-89, 90-91) about 15-18 years ago and was pretty attentive when it came to the details. I wish I paid more attention to top to bottom centering than I did. I was mostly attentive about left to right centering. Anyway, it's nice to have the grades in as a testament to my efforts long ago.
is this true?
julen
RIP GURU
randy
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.
looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started
PSA 9 Checklist: $300-$500
Based on recent EBay sales.
<< <i>PSA 10 Karl Malone: $500-$700
PSA 9 Checklist: $300-$500
Based on recent EBay sales. >>
wow! I had no idea. Eventually, these will be sold. However, I have to learn more about reasonable prices and may submit more before committing to selling any of the cards.
If you get semi-stars graded, you are venturing into dimishing returns IMO.
I would wait until the season started, due to some small scandal going on