Okay, why doesn't this coin make full band (torch)?
fcloud
Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
Anyway it made MS67 and it sure is close!
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
0
Comments
Ken
I see nothing else keeping it out of a FB holder. Only other reason would be WHEN it was graded, before or after PCGS started the clads in FB holders.
<< <i>If weakness exists on the lower bands, it must be on the left (shaded) side.
I see nothing else keeping it out of a FB holder. Only other reason would be WHEN it was graded, before or after PCGS started the clads in FB holders. >>
Graded last week.
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
What is the cert #? May be that it comes up as FB, making it a mech error.
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
Boy, do we agree on that TDN!!!!! I have been saying AND doing that for years now.
If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
-David
<< <i>Well at least this submission I was able to get five out of six. I've had a tough time figuring these out. I have some that look better than this one that hadn't made it either. They must use a microscope to make sure the bands are there. You can barley see this one when it is enlarged to the extent I had to make it just to see it didn't make it. Thanks for the comments everyone. >>
A designation that requires a microscope to determine is not one for which I'd pay very much of a premium.
morph towards a looser definition of FB.
roadrunner
In no case over the past 20 years has anything tightened up over the long run. AT least not from what I can see. It would be nice to see grade deflation, but I don't think it's realistic.
roadrunner
<< <i>.....yep, there's a bunch of folk here that go after the nicest of the nice non-FB coins.......and prices have improved in the last year after dropping precariously after the FB designation intro several years ago. >>
Who are they ?
Ken
<< <i><< .....yep, there's a bunch of folk here that go after the nicest of the nice non-FB coins.......and prices have improved in the last year after dropping precariously after the FB designation intro several years ago. >> >>
<< <i><< Who are they ?
Ken >> >>
Ken
Craig's correct, and I would place myself in that classification. Many of my best Roosies are Non-full Band. Rainbowroosie is another who could care less about the Bands. We love "color" first...MS67+ (speaking for myself). Although I own a number of very colorful MS66's.
Later, Paul.
Later, Paul.
<< <i>Anyway it made MS67 and it sure is close!
>>
Looks like a nice Q3 quality coin if Roosevelt's profile and the rest of the coin is as markfree as the picture shows. The strike looks very strong with plenty of detail in hair. Strike, grade/condition and luster are the 3 qualities I see. A very desirable coin if it's markfree!
Some eye appealing toning would make it a rare Q4 coin. Add an EDS strike (worth two points in my book) and prooflike surfaces or fields and we're looking at the most coveted coin of them all, the Q6!
Make no mistake about it, the most discriminating eye will seek out those coins with the most qualities about them!
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
<< <i>This brings to mind my philosophy that if I collected this series I'd try to buy the nicest non FB coins I could ... rather than pay a huge premium for the tiniest bit of extra strike. >>
A tiny bit missing dime. Can you see the missing part ? Price difference is about a cool $1000.00
Ken