Anyone see anything wrong ?

TNTonPMS · June 21, 2007 1:19PM

Just goin through some cards and noticed he was born in 95 ?
Is that 1995 or 1895 ?

jimq112 · June 21, 2007 2:39PM

Born in 1995?

1989FleerBillRipkencollector · June 22, 2007 2:02AM

They sign players earlier every year. I mean when my wife announced to the family we were having a boy, in comes the Yankees to talk about a deal.

envoy98 · June 22, 2007 2:05AM

In that particular case it's just an error. He was a rookie in 89. Now that would be signing them early!

jradke4 · June 22, 2007 2:06AM

his rookie card is from 89. But from those stats he was a rookie in 1987.

envoy98 · June 22, 2007 3:11AM

HA! They also say he was born in '95. Everything they say is suspect now! Who are you going to believe? Score, who released his card appropriately in 1989, not making him a rookie until he could be included in the greatest modern football set (no offense 84 Topps) or Upper Deck who wanted him born 6 years after his first card?

I think the decision is obvious.

julen23 · June 22, 2007 3:35AM

barry sanders cut several years off woodson's career on a very simple (sp!) cutback move.

barry rules

julen
tgif

Anyone see anything wrong ?

Comments