1967 Topps baseball experts, is this trimmed or ok?

I just got this 1967 Topps Orlando Cepeda off of Ebay, and when it arrived, immediatly noticed that the card looked a little narrow. When I got home, I compared it to a 1992 Bowman card that I just pulled from a pack. The Cepeda is a little taller than the usual card, but narrower. Think this could have been a trim job? I compared it to about 50 1967 Topps cards I have (raw and graded), and noticed some size variation between all the cards (including one common card that was cut exactly like the Cepeda).
In the pic below, I did a little photoshop magic and diced up the 1992 Bowman card so you can see how the 4 edges of the Cepeda compare.
Under my loupe, the corner wear on the card seems fairly consistant, as in, it doesn't look cut off.
What do you think? Trimmed, or just cut weird?
In the pic below, I did a little photoshop magic and diced up the 1992 Bowman card so you can see how the 4 edges of the Cepeda compare.
Under my loupe, the corner wear on the card seems fairly consistant, as in, it doesn't look cut off.
What do you think? Trimmed, or just cut weird?

0
Comments
My eye is catching the left side as well. Hard to explain, but that is what my eye goes to first. So something ain't right. But then again PSA graders have proved me wrong many a time.
Ron
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
ALL of my 1967s (graded and raw, all picked up from various places) have some texture to the edges. The Cepeda is completely smooth on all 4 edges.
Is the semi-rough cut on this year common enough to make a smooth-edged card a suspect?
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
"you cant stop reggie,
you can only hope to contain him"
julen
RIP GURU
Does anyone have a problem with me?
julen
ps: stop trippin' boo
RIP GURU
At least the corners are sharp