OK Messageboard - I need opinions on this 1974 Deckle - Counterfeit? I think so!
I actually have a 1974 Topps Deckle Edge Bob Gibson graded a PSA 8. I am selling it due to the fact that I don't need one in that good of condition. I have been looking for a raw one. Well, I found one on Ebay with a Buy It Now for $90 with a seller with 99.9% feedback. I thought, "this is great." Well, I get it today and take a real good look at it - not so great.
First of all, it is not "deckled" at all (even though it looked it in the seller's scan). If you look at my picture below, you can see that it has a straight edge, with a "phantom" deckled edge and a border. I got suspicious real quick. So, I took my Lou Brock and compared the size of the deckled part, and sure enough, the Gibson (just the deckled part) is a little larger than the Brock. That's not all. I then very closely compared the PSA 8 with the one I just got. The pixels are much different. The one I got today is VERY pixelated (if that's a word). I can really tell it on the hat. The PSA 8 is much more smooth in the hat area, while the pixels on the one I got today is very noticeable. Oh, and that's not all. If you take a look at the left edge on the first "corner" above the black shaded area (straight over from the tip of his nose) you can tell that this card I have is just a picture of the card because I can see wear on that "corner". It is also evident on the right edge on the first corner in the black area just over from the bottom part of his ear.
My thinking is this is almost certainly a counterfeit.
I have never heard of these being counterfeit. Have any of you? I am not blaming the seller. Maybe he thought that it was just a proof version because the proof versions do have straight edges. The proof versions, however, have nothing "deckled" about them.
Your thoughts would be appreciated.
Here is a scan of the entire card and a closeup of the left edge.

First of all, it is not "deckled" at all (even though it looked it in the seller's scan). If you look at my picture below, you can see that it has a straight edge, with a "phantom" deckled edge and a border. I got suspicious real quick. So, I took my Lou Brock and compared the size of the deckled part, and sure enough, the Gibson (just the deckled part) is a little larger than the Brock. That's not all. I then very closely compared the PSA 8 with the one I just got. The pixels are much different. The one I got today is VERY pixelated (if that's a word). I can really tell it on the hat. The PSA 8 is much more smooth in the hat area, while the pixels on the one I got today is very noticeable. Oh, and that's not all. If you take a look at the left edge on the first "corner" above the black shaded area (straight over from the tip of his nose) you can tell that this card I have is just a picture of the card because I can see wear on that "corner". It is also evident on the right edge on the first corner in the black area just over from the bottom part of his ear.
My thinking is this is almost certainly a counterfeit.
I have never heard of these being counterfeit. Have any of you? I am not blaming the seller. Maybe he thought that it was just a proof version because the proof versions do have straight edges. The proof versions, however, have nothing "deckled" about them.
Your thoughts would be appreciated.
Here is a scan of the entire card and a closeup of the left edge.


Shane
0
Comments
Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007
Al
One thing I forgot to mention - This Gibson "seems" thicker than the Brock that I have. I could not really tell by looking, but it just felt thicker and sturdier.
Shane
"...Generally, the counterfeits can be seen to have a much grayer appearance than the genuine black-and-white cards, lacking much of the contrast. This is caused by the counterfeit having a black dot structure to the photo that is much heaver than the genuine.
The easiest method of distinguishing the counterfeit ‘74 deckles from the genuine cards is to examine the area of the blue facsimile signature on the front of the card. The counterfeits have a black "shadow" of dots visible under magnification beneath the signature. This is not present on the genuine cards."
Lots of stuff has been hit by the counterfeiters. It's crazy. According to the book, they've even hit the 1987 Fleer Ruben Sierra rc!
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007
Al
PM sent.
digicat,
thanks for the info. That is exactly what I am finding (about the dots).
Shane
Shane
Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007
Al
Shane
Shane
<< <i>He did reply. He said that he would refund if "proven" to be counterfeit. I hope that doesn't mean that we have to send to PSA to verify because I KNOW they are counterfeit. >>
why should that matter?
If you want to refund it, he should accept it and refund you the bid price.
Have you left feedback?
Does his auction state anything about returns?
Did you use paypal?
Shane
If you know a little HTML, put this stuff up in a web page and send him the link to it.
While I'm not an expert on this issue at all, I did a search on Google and Ebay for "1974 Topps Deckle proof" and found something totally different from what this guy is selling. Cards w/o the deckle, but the deckle isn't printed on the card.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
Yes, please scan it. If you want to, just post the scan right here and I will copy it and send it along with my scans in an email. Thanks for offering.
Shane
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
Shane
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25