Home U.S. Coin Forum

1931-S Cracked Buffalo

Has a crack starting in the middle of the cheek down through hair,then splits into a Y and has alot of material along the crack route.I want to say lamination,but not sure.Need some other opinions.Hope the pics help.

imageimage


imageimage


image

Honest Chris,i was going to say delamination. Thanks

Comments

  • guitarwesguitarwes Posts: 9,308 ✭✭✭
    I can't find the "zoom out a little" button on the pics?


    @ Elite CNC Routing & Woodworks on Facebook. Check out my work.
    Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
  • BlackBeardBlackBeard Posts: 1,064


    << <i>I can't find the "zoom out a little" button on the pics? >>



    Agreed, maybe posting an innie and an outie would clear it up.
    Witty sig line currently under construction. Thank you for your patience.
  • coinsarefuncoinsarefun Posts: 21,781 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I had very similar looking crack on my Morgan and was told its lamination.
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭


    This is neither a die crack nor lamination. This is known as DELAMINATION.


    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭

    FYI: Lamination occurs when something comes between the planchet and the die leaving an impression from the foriegn object on the coin. Delmanation occurs when the planchet is poorly prepared resulting in peeling of the planchet surface.

    Lamination and delamination are all too frequently confused. They are NOT related in any way.


    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 11,034 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 6,025 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Those definitions are not correct, in my opinion.
    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Those definitions are not correct, in my opinion. >>


    Fred - Please let us know how you would correct these. Thanks.

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 6,025 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A lamination is the flaking of the metal on the
    coins surface, due to improper metal mixture.
    (the improper metal mixture can also cause a
    "occludded gas bubble", which "pops", after
    the coin is struck (and in circuation, sometimes)

    It can be a small or large flake, still attached.

    It can be a "void" in the surface of the coin, after the
    piece of metal has come detached.

    The term "Lamination", "detached lamination", or
    "attached lamination" have been used, and are
    all accurate, imo.

    I've never used, and have only rarely heard, the
    term "delamination" - that would fall under the
    above descriptions. It's not a term used by
    error collectors.

    Something on the dies, or the surface of the coin itself that
    is not part of the coin, would be a "Struck Thru" - which is
    a very large catagory, and coins are "struck thru" a wide
    variety of things - grease, metal flakes, washers, wood
    chips, etc. etc. etc. and so on.....

    Hope this helps a bit - I just wanted to make sure that your
    first sentence (a few posts up), was clarified.

    Fred
    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • coinsarefuncoinsarefun Posts: 21,781 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Fred,then this would be called lamination?
    Sorry, beginner here. Thanks

    image
    image
    image
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭

    Thanks Fred,

    I agree that "lamination" is commonly used as you mentioned above. But "delamination" as used in the fields of material science and metallurgy refers to the peeling away of a material surface due to improper mixture of an alloy or additive or from trapped volatiles.

    I know I'm fighting a losing battle here, but when I see the term "lamination", I can't help but to cringe and wonder how this shortened version of the word "delamination" became a part of numismatic vocabulary when the two words have different meanings.










    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭


    coinsarefun - Looks like a missing feather to me. image

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • coinsarefuncoinsarefun Posts: 21,781 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The lamination or crack(IMO) starts at the die gouge works its way down to the feathers and where the feathers are missing chunks are missing and dark from toning(tarnish)
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 6,025 ✭✭✭✭✭


    Like a "Clipped Planchet" being a total misnomer, I then
    would agree that "lamination" isn't correct, but it's usage
    has been in the error hobby since the 1950's, at least.....

    As far as the silver dollar, the scans aren't that great, but
    it looks like a "struck thru" to me.

    It's not a die crack at all - and the shiny area says that the
    area in question was struck-thru a small sliver of metal,
    then fell off, leaving the shiny area, or, the shiny area is
    the result of a "delamination", after the coin is struck.

    Can't tell which, from the scans......
    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • coinsarefuncoinsarefun Posts: 21,781 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 6,025 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, the last scan doesn't help.

    Can you scan it flat, and with a nice
    closeup of the area????

    Sometimes, these things can't be
    identified by scans only -
    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • Where else can you get infomation like this from some of the top numismatists in their field.The Forum should always stay as it was intended,about the coin hobby and all it encompasses.No need for some of the trash talking threads that sometimes find their way in here.Above are some truly noteworthy posts that give information and opinions.It does'nt get any better than this. Thanks
  • coinsarefuncoinsarefun Posts: 21,781 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ok, I am going to try again , but still blurry. Got to invest in some decent equipment, not the kids scope.

    image

    working from upper left down through to wing took closeups ending at the missing pieces.
    image
    image
    image
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Like a "Clipped Planchet" being a total misnomer, I then
    would agree that "lamination" isn't correct, but it's usage
    has been in the error hobby since the 1950's, at least..... >>



    But Fred, if anyone in the field could change this, you're the guy. No one would question your clarification on this matter.

    Oh well, what can one guy do.

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file