Question: Qualifier or No Qualifier

Guys, I'm about to send in 110+ cards from the '56 Topps Football set which will put me just a few cards short of the complete 120 card set graded. My question is, I'm going to sell the set (or near set) when I get them graded but I wanted to know everyone's preference or opinion on whether to specify for NO QUALIFIERS or not when I send to PSA. Do buyers generally prefer an 8OC or a 6 (considering the qualifier)? Which way might likely garner more money from an auction? Most of the cards probably wouldn't get the dreaded OC qualifier anyway, but there are about 15-20 that probably might. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. (The cards are generally in very good shape, I pulled two of the best looking ones and they both graded an 8 and I know there are many more that will grade in the 7-8 range)
Thanks,
Matt
Thanks,
Matt
"A flute with no holes is not a flute, a donut with no holes is a danish" - Chevy Chase
"I have a split personality, and he is a regular SOB"
"I have a split personality, and he is a regular SOB"
0
Comments
///////////////////////////////////
I would let the chips fall where they fall.
But, Q cards are/can be quite difficult to sell.
"I have a split personality, and he is a regular SOB"
Thanks,
Matt
"I have a split personality, and he is a regular SOB"
"I have a split personality, and he is a regular SOB"
//////////////////////////////////////////
I prefer 9 OCs to shabby-cornered 7s.
The current market does not agree with me.
OC cards are HEAVILY penalized, in money terms.
I really do not know how the pictured cards
could escape the OC without specifying no Q.
If PSA cuts the series some slack, then maybe.
As to whether or not the $800 is well spent,
I would say "yes." Graded cards look nicer
and are easier to sell. The slab also removes
buyers' concerns about trimmed/altered.
The suggestion to upgrade a few b4 sale may not
be practical, but it is likely/maybe good advice.
"I have a split personality, and he is a regular SOB"
John
HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS
PSA Card Grading Standards
EX-MT 6: Excellent-Mint.
Centering must be 80/20 or better on the front
EX 5: Excellent.
Centering must be 85/15 or better on the front
Not sure these would even qualify as straight 5's.
For way off-centered, nearly miscut cards like these, you're better off with the OC qualifier.
"How about a little fire Scarecrow ?"
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
Kind of like you can request NQ on a card with a wax stain, but it will almost always come back with an ST qualifier.
Lee
<< <i>PSA doesn't always grant the "No qualifiers" request, especially on cards that clearly need a qualifier. >>
Heh, oddly enough, the Eck rookie I posted above was sent in with one of my first subs, and I had requested "no qualifiers". I'm glad I got the qualifier though.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
"I have a split personality, and he is a regular SOB"
<< <i>and I think that an 8OC grade is much more accurate a representation of the quality of the card in relation to the others than a 5 with poor centering would be. >>
If you are looking to make a profit I think raw is probably better. Just a guess as I don't follow that particular set on Ebay. I just doubt there is enough interest to generate a huge price for the graded "almost" set. I would, in fact, probably sell individually and raw. Good luck!
<< <i>For way off-centered, nearly miscut cards like these, you're better off with the OC qualifier. >>
My eBay Store
BigCrumbs! I made over $250 last year!
<< <i>For my personal collection, I'll take a 9 oc over a 7 any day. Then again, I'm the kind of collector that weighs "lack of damage" a little higher than centering.
Me too, it's not anyones fault the way they come out of the packs
It is your fault for the way they are treated after opening.
I'd much rather have an undameged card off center than damaged corners or bends or obviously mistreated cards .
"I have a split personality, and he is a regular SOB"
You're on the right track.
I would have the commons graded that you think will bring an 8 or better
and the stars graded that you think will bring a 7 or better.
Then I would sell those graded cards each one individually.
As for the remaining raw cards,
I would sell the ungraded star cards each one individually
and sell off the remaining ungraded commons as one lot.
Card selling 101 ...
"How about a little fire Scarecrow ?"
<< <i>Hey Guys, for sheer profit reasons it seems like alot of you are saying that I should try and sell the set some graded and some raw. Would I be better off picking out the cards that I know will grade 7's or higher and get them graded and then sell them with the raw as a near complete set? I already got 3 of the cards graded - two PSA 8's (#77 Charley Conerly SMR $90 and #86 Y.A Tittle SMR $115) and the tough to find unmarked checklist graded 7MC (SMR for a straight 7 unmarked checklist is $340 but who knows what the MC will knock off of that). I'm not to hot on the idea of having to pay $7 per card for grading ($777 total for 111 cards) when I know that a decent number of them will probably get 5's and 6's which for sure won't even get the $7 grading fee back. So now I really don't know what to do........bite the bullet and get the whole bunch graded hoping for the best from PSA, or cherry pick the sure 7's and better for submission and then try and sell as a partial graded and raw set. HELP!
One of the great things about situations like this is that if you know what you're doing, and you think a decision is close, then that's probably because the decision IS close, which means it matters very little which route you choose (lots of poker decisions fall into this catagory, but it applies nicely here as well). Do what feels right; the odds are very good that it doesn't matter much either way.