Three different mint sets, any Franklin FBL?

coinsarefun

I just picked up three different mint sets. One set is a mix of the 1940's, but I think they all look pretty good. Some even have some toning. Do you think any have a chance at FBL?
Or do need closer pictures?

1940's mint set





1959 mint set





1960-D mint set

SkyMan

At PCGS I would say probably, probably, and hard to tell from the image. On the other hand none of them is a 65 so don't waste your money.

twodrhrdtp

the 48 and 59 look FBL cant tell from pic on the 60. I agree they will all be 64 at best.

DoubleEagle59

All three look like FBL. I agree with others that they grade ms64.

tightbudget

I think all of them are FBL...but that's just my opinion.

RW

maybe
no...there's a hit through the lines
maybe

clarkbar04

FBL on the 1st 2 for sure.

Wanna sell that 47 washington?

coinsarefun

Thanks, but I think I want to keep it. It looks to me like its a repunched mint mark under magnification.

mcheath

48 is full bell

59 is/looks full bell-

60 looks full bell but it is harder to tell from the photos

the 48 is ms63 IMO

the 59 looks to be at least 64 possibly 65 but again hard to tell from images

the 60 looks to be 63 maybe 64

clarkbar04

<< <i>Thanks, but I think I want to keep it. It looks to me like its a repunched mint mark under magnification. >>



Oh - didn't notice the S in the 2nd pic. I need a philly!

I need to get a new loupe, I think I have one of those RPMs too.

coinsarefun

No problem,
Can you give me your opinion on the mintmark on the 1960-D Roosevelt.
It looks doubled or tripled to me.
Or maybe its just machine doubling.