How many times have you cracked & resubmitted a card?

Just curious if there are any success stories out there (I assume there are) and if so, how many times you've resubmitted the same card in an effort to get the grade you believe it should have before finally getting it or finally giving up. I've only recently begun subbing cards so I have none, but I'm curious to know if anyone out here's had at it before.
0
Comments
~ms
I spoke with one dealer at the National a couple of years ago and he said 10-12 times wasn't unusual for him, and his record was 14. So much for the pop reports.
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's
There was recently a thread on here about never ever submittting a card in another slab. So I spent a saturday cracking about 80 slabs and I sent them in loose. Im waiting for the results. i saved all the old gem stickers and the psa stickers with evid trim etc. My own ittle experiment.
joe
He must deal in a lot of cards that are on the cusp of a very high return. Otherwise, I don't see the point considering the fees and the turnaround time.
I've never resubmitted a card more than twice, but I've gotten a bump around 75% of the time on the first try. I guess I'm pretty conservative with my crackouts, but most of the cards I submit aren't worth more than a few shots (if that).
I have yet to do it. I cracked a card once, and destroyed the card (it wasn't anything of value), but it was enough for me to not do it again.
Any tips?
<< <i>It is often worth the effort. >>
I'm on 5+ with a few cards... 9/9/9/9/9.....
<< <i>Sorry about the last post.
I have yet to do it. I cracked a card once, and destroyed the card (it wasn't anything of value), but it was enough for me to not do it again.
Any tips? >>
Jjins, You should be able to find the correct way to crack one in your sig.
MY GOLD TYPE SET https://pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/complete-type-sets/gold-type-set-12-piece-circulation-strikes-1839-1933/publishedset/321940
Bosox1976
collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.
looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started
I had one grade a 6, I knew it was a 7. Next two times came back 3's both times, and then got the 7. It was definitely worth it.
And anticipating your next comment, I've talked to people that have repeatedly (and successfully) cracked and resubmitted cards to grading companies in Santa Ana AND Paramus.
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's
<< <i>crack and resubmit = silly concept >>
If a card looks undergraded, I don't see anything silly about resubmitting it. Especially if it is to be sold. No sense leaving money on the table. Some cards just fall on the border between grades and could go either way (up or down).
<< <i>Southern- you think so?
I had one grade a 6, I knew it was a 7. Next two times came back 3's both times, and then got the 7. It was definitely worth it.
And anticipating your next comment, I've talked to people that have repeatedly (and successfully) cracked and resubmitted cards to grading companies in Santa Ana AND Paramus. >>
Actually, I do.
If you keep fishing for opinions over and over until you get the one you want, how accurate is that opinion now? Your card went from a 6 to a 3 to a 3 to a 7? Do you really feel good about that 7? Would a potential buyer really want that card knowing the 6, 3, 3, 7, story? All that becomes is a matter of buying the flip and not the card....silly
oh and its Parsippany, not Paramus. Paramus is in Bergen County. Parsippany is further south.
The card was a solid 7 to begin with. The grades I was not comfortable with were the 6 and 3's. It's one of the few issues I think I know quite well and feel very comfortable with its assigned grade- from where it will live out my days encapsulated as a 7.
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's
<< <i>
<< <i>crack and resubmit = silly concept >>
If a card looks undergraded, I don't see anything silly about resubmitting it. Especially if it is to be sold. No sense leaving money on the table. Some cards just fall on the border between grades and could go either way (up or down). >>
If the card looks undergraded, crack and sell it raw. If a card falls on the border between grades, choose a grading company with smaller borders. If you are concerned with leaving money on the table more than introducing a potentially overgraded card into the market, that's on you.
<< <i>i stand corrected. Parsippany.
The card was a solid 7 to begin with. The grades I was not comfortable with were the 6 and 3's. It's one of the few issues I think I know quite well and feel very comfortable with its assigned grade- from where it will live out my days encapsulated as a 7. >>
what is it about the card that caused it to come back twice as a 3? is there a hairline crease? If 2 different graders saw it as a 3, doesnt that tell you that there is something really wrong that you arent seeing?
<< <i>And who can really tell the difference between a MINT and GEM MINT card? Yet people continue to pay many multiples to upgrade from a 9 (or 96) to a 10 (or 98). >>
This is what I want to know - what is the difference? Is there one to the human eye?
<< <i>
This is what I want to know - what is the difference? Is there one to the human eye? >>
With my grader of choice, I have often been able to tell the difference on some cards, not all
<< <i>
<< <i>
This is what I want to know - what is the difference? Is there one to the human eye? >>
With my grader of choice, I have often been able to tell the difference on some cards, not all >>
The only difference is usually with the centering. A fair amount of MINT cards are outside the 55-45 centering guideline. Aside from that, I challange people to pick the GEM MINT card out of a lineup that includes a handful of solid MINT cards. I find it particularly difficult with the newer cards. How can a pack fresh refractor or chrome card be anything less than a 10?
3 times on a 68 Topps Mantle card that i know is a 9 and keeps coming back an 8.
That's because it's a Mantle, Hoss!
Keep tryin'!
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>crack and resubmit = silly concept >>
If a card looks undergraded, I don't see anything silly about resubmitting it. Especially if it is to be sold. No sense leaving money on the table. Some cards just fall on the border between grades and could go either way (up or down). >>
If the card looks undergraded, crack and sell it raw. If a card falls on the border between grades, choose a grading company with smaller borders. If you are concerned with leaving money on the table more than introducing a potentially overgraded card into the market, that's on you. >>
Uh, who else could it possibly 'be on'?
1979 PSA 8 #390 earl Campbell, 1st time PSA 9OC, 2nd time PSA 8, 3rd time PSA 9.
1977 Steve Largent SGC 92, 1st PSA 8, Second PSA 9
1954 Ed Mathews SGC 84, 1st Time PSA 7, Second time PSA 8
1971-72 Jerry West SGC 92, 1st time PSA 8 Second time PSA 9
1972 Thurman Munson Pulled from pack, 1st time PSA 8 second PSA 9
1951 Blue Back Enos Slaughter SGC 80 1st time PSA 9
1940 Play Ball Ted Williams ASA 7 1st time PSA 5 second time PSA 6
And several others