Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

I've just about had it.....


with all of the greed in Major League Baseball, they can keep it. If Comcast does not ink this deal today, It will be 7 years before they will get another chance to bid. I'll be damned if i am going to watch a baseball game on a computer!! And i'm sure as hell not switching from Comcast to Direct TV. This whole thing is all about money,greed and power. If MLB refuses to work with Comcast and act this way, i am not spending dime one on this game again. BTW,anyone take a family of 4 to a ballgame lately? Thanks alot MLB!! Thanks for nothing.

Signed,
One pissed off fan

Comments

  • amen. read my mind.


    image
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,564 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They couldn't learn from the NHL's debacle?
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • halosfanhalosfan Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭✭
    While I agree with the sentiment ... COMCAST BLOWS ... I'm all for Direct TV. Screw the cable companies
    Looking for a Glen Rice Inkredible and Alex Rodriguez cards
  • bighurt2000bighurt2000 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭
    I think anyone that don't have Direct TV and love to watch sports are living in the stone age
  • Carew29Carew29 Posts: 4,025 ✭✭

    Well halosfan, your comment is screwing 60,000,000 other viewers . Oh, but that's right, you didn't bother to read what Congress had to say about this on Wednesday did you? though i personally can't stand Sen. Kerry, my hat is off to him on this subject. He got it right. Comcast offered exactly and even went over on their offer (which MLB said they would accept) only to slap it down. I hope i heard right today that Comcast would file an injunction to block this Monopoly. I would expect COMCAST BLOWS from a 13 year old. Try spouting something intelligent next time.

    Out!!
  • halosfanhalosfan Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭✭
    WOW ... that was unexpected. I, for one, have been a DirecTV subscriber for nearly a decade. For a short spell during that time I had to get Comcast service -- not related to any issues with DirecTV. I cancelled Comcast as soon as my other issues were resolved. Comcast is an absolute horrible company to deal with from a consumer standpoint and they would like nothing better to regain their hold on their markets. I see this as a good move. Cable companies are way too influential and not responsive to consumers. They act as if it is solely their right to provide service -- like a monnopoly.

    I don't understand why NFL ticket, MLB ticket, NBA season pass, et.al. are not made available to all service providers. I can only assume that MLB came to the conclusion that Comcast was being unreasonable. Maybe your angst should be directed towards them.

    I did mention that I agree MLB is very greedy and DirecTV is the best service out there for sports fans.

    Try to keep personal insults out of this. I've done nothing to you.

    Have a good one,

    Matthew
    Looking for a Glen Rice Inkredible and Alex Rodriguez cards
  • BoopottsBoopotts Posts: 6,784 ✭✭
    I'll be curious to see just far this cash grab can go before MLB-- and other sports which abide by these same pratices-- gets marginalized, and other sports spring up to fill the vacuum. Look at pro boxing. That sport had a stranglehold on the American sports fan in the first part of this century, and now nobody could care less. How much of that is due purely to changes in taste I don't know, but I wonder if the switch to PPV (this would be a good time to ask: who pays $50 to watch a boxing match on their television) didn't have something to do with it.

    FWIW I don't hold this against MLB. If it makes them more money then God bless 'em. But I think one of the long term effects of these arrangements may be the futher alienation of the casual fan. I'm actually kind of expecting Arena Football to become the 'next big thing' in North American sports, since the league appears to be run by smart people and their games are accessible. We'll see how it shakes out.
  • larryallen73larryallen73 Posts: 6,067 ✭✭✭
    Try spouting something intelligent next time.

    Maybe Carew29 was just saying a friendly April Fool's joke!? image
  • OnlypsahockeyOnlypsahockey Posts: 1,479 ✭✭
    << BTW,anyone take a family of 4 to a ballgame lately? >>

    Yep, $800.00....and no Remdog! Never again!
    57 Topps (83%) 7.61
    61 Topps (100%) 7.96
    62 Parkhurst (100%) 8.70
    63 Topps (100%) 7.96
    63 York WB's (50%) 8.52
    68 Topps (39%) 8.54
    69 Topps (3%) 9.00
    69 OPC (83%) 8.21
    71 Topps (100%) 9.21 #1 A.T.F.
    72 Topps (100%) 9.39
    73 Topps (13%) 9.35
    74 OPC WHA (95%) 8.57
    75 Topps (50%) 9.23
    77 OPC WHA (86%) 8.62 #1 A.T.F.
    88 Topps (5%) 10.00
  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭
    Does this mean I won't get Red Sox games on NESN?
    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • ctsoxfanctsoxfan Posts: 6,246 ✭✭
    This whole deal stinks - and MLB is shafting over 200,000 of its most loyal customers (the people, like myself, who have cable and paid over $150 last year to order MLB Extra Innings) by making this deal with Directv.

    By all accounts, Directv needed to make this deal, in order to remain competitive in the marketplace. Cable, and soon phone companies, offer complete solutions (TV, Internet, phone, OnDemand) while satellite companies can offer TV only - and thus it is a dying industry. I used to have Directv for years, but switched back to cable a few years ago - and I get much more service (and better) for less money. Most baseball fans will not switch to Directv over this, and the game of baseball will become a lot less important to a lot of people. Bad move, MLB.

    And, thanks Charter for offering me MLB.TV for free this year, but its just not the same. Who wants to watch baseball on their computer? I want to watch it in the living room on my HD plasma, while relaxing in my easy chair. These guys just don't get it.
    image
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    COMCAST BLOWS...................


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • BoopottsBoopotts Posts: 6,784 ✭✭


    << <i>This whole deal stinks - and MLB is shafting over 200,000 of its most loyal customers (the people, like myself, who have cable and paid over $150 last year to order MLB Extra Innings) by making this deal with Directv.

    By all accounts, Directv needed to make this deal, in order to remain competitive in the marketplace. Cable, and soon phone companies, offer complete solutions (TV, Internet, phone, OnDemand) while satellite companies can offer TV only - and thus it is a dying industry. I used to have Directv for years, but switched back to cable a few years ago - and I get much more service (and better) for less money. Most baseball fans will not switch to Directv over this, and the game of baseball will become a lot less important to a lot of people. Bad move, MLB.

    And, thanks Charter for offering me MLB.TV for free this year, but its just not the same. Who wants to watch baseball on their computer? I want to watch it in the living room on my HD plasma, while relaxing in my easy chair. These guys just don't get it. >>




  • Alfonz24Alfonz24 Posts: 3,114 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I may be getting Direct TV if Charter drops the Golf Channel. The contract is up April 4th and no agreement.
    #LetsGoSwitzerlandThe Man Who Does Not Read Has No Advantage Over the Man Who Cannot Read. The biggest obstacle to progress is a habit of “buying what we want and begging for what we need.”You get the Freedom you fight for and get the Oppression you deserve.
  • ctsoxfanctsoxfan Posts: 6,246 ✭✭
    Come on Boopotts - what did you say? I missed it... image
    image
  • GDM67GDM67 Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭✭
    I'm fairly certain that DirecTV has plans to co-create an official MLB Channel in 2008, which is one reason this deal was made. I'm a DirecTV subscriber, also for nearly a decade, and I really don't see this as a good business decision for MLB, as it basically denies a product to consumers willing to pay for it.

    Having said that, doesn't the NFL have the same exclusivity arrangement with the DirecTV? And isn't that the reason that some cable companies refuse to carry The NFL Network? While Bud can usually be counted on to be shortsighted and foolish, the NFL usually isn't, so that makes me wonder if this might not actually pay off for them in the long run.

    I know people are getting jobbed in the meantime (if I hadn't had a particular copse of trees in the way, I would have Dish service now, and be every bit as angry myself), but that's modern America for you.
  • Carew29Carew29 Posts: 4,025 ✭✭

    Received this wonderful news today.

    Due to a decision by Major League Baseball, Comcast, as well as many other cable operators will not be able to distribute the 2007 MLB Extra Innings out-of-market package.

    If you are a current Comcast customer and subscribed to Comcast 2006 MLB Extra Innings, you should receive correspondence from Comcast no later than April 11, 2007 with an offer to help make up for the loss of MLB Extra Innings, with an opportunity to subscribe to MLB.TV. With MLB.TV you can use your computer to view all the same games you would see on TV with MLB Extra Innings.

    If you do not receive notification by April 11, 2007, please call: 1-800-631-0258, and have your Comcast account number available for 2006 MLB Extra Innings subscription verification.

    If you are a current Comcast customer and have subscribed to the 2007 MLB Extra Innings package, we will refund your payment in the form of a credit to your monthly bill.

    In 2007, Comcast will be providing a great selection of up to 400 national, regional and local live televised baseball games, many in high-definition. We hope the combination of the MLB.TV offer and the large live televised schedule make up for the loss of MLB Extra Innings.

    Again, should you need any assistance in signing up for MLB.TV after receiving your special offer in the mail, please contact: 1-800-631-0258.

    --------------------------------------------

    My reply is MLB BLOWS!!
  • theczartheczar Posts: 1,590 ✭✭
    Cable, and soon phone companies, offer complete solutions (TV, Internet, phone, OnDemand) while satellite companies can offer TV only - and thus it is a dying industry

    CTsoxfan,
    Perhaps you are having a bad day when wrote that. Satellite a dying industry? That is ridiculous. Cable had to get into other venues because DirecTV and even Dish Network thumping them. Customer Service is so much better, more HI Def possibilities, endless more channels and it is cheaper. The super Bowl was not even in High def on the cable system in my city! When it comes to broadcasting TV shows cable is the dinosaur.

    Don't believe that satellite is on the rise? Click here: 16 million Directv customers and growing

    DirectTV paid the fees to get this exclusive deal done. Sorry if you don't like it but blame your cable company.

    I have no relative that works for the satellite companies. These are just the facts.


  • markj111markj111 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Cable, and soon phone companies, offer complete solutions (TV, Internet, phone, OnDemand) while satellite companies can offer TV only - and thus it is a dying industry

    CTsoxfan,
    Perhaps you are having a bad day when wrote that. Satellite a dying industry? That is ridiculous. Cable had to get into other venues because DirecTV and even Dish Network thumping them. Customer Service is so much better, more HI Def possibilities, endless more channels and it is cheaper. The super Bowl was not even in High def on the cable system in my city! When it comes to broadcasting TV shows cable is the dinosaur.

    Don't believe that satellite is on the rise? Click here: 16 million Directv customers and growing

    DirectTV paid the fees to get this exclusive deal done. Sorry if you don't like it but blame your cable company.

    I have no relative that works for the satellite companies. These are just the facts. >>



    Do not forget that cable offered to match the Direct TV offer, and MLB blew them off. It is obvious that the window given to cable was total BS. I love baseball, but I will not switch to Direct TV, and will not spend one nickel on MLB this year. I used to go to a lot of games with a friend; after 94 he quit going and has not been to one since. I may join him on the sidelines.
  • JdurgJdurg Posts: 997
    That's just the sad direction that EVERYTHING is going these days. Back in 1998, my cable company refused to provide the MSG Network. (They were run by Red Sox fans and the owners stated "We will not provide a "Yankees" sponsored network." Of course that was all a lie, but they made the decisions and until they gave up ownership we didn't get the MSG Network). Anyway, if I wanted to listen to a ball game I could go online and click on a link and the radio broadcast of that game could be played through my computer. I remember listening to David Wells' perfect game through the online radio broadcast. It was all FREE and you could also get a gamecast-like broadcast of the game on your screen.

    A few years later, MLB took over ALL broadcasts and started charging you if you wanted to listen to FREE radio. I said "F*&% You!" in a nasty e-mail to MLB and have never bought any of those broadcast packages. It's disgusting that I can't just have the game playing on my computer in my office at work while getting work done unless I use a CPU Hogging piece of software and pay MLB an ungodly sum of money to listen to the game.

    Then, ESPN decided that if you want to use anything on their site you have to be an "insider". So no more live game broadcasts, no more meaningful articles, no more ANYTHING unless you cough up twenty bucks a month or so. Again, things that rightfully should be "free" are no longer.

    This is just the pattern we are falling in. Soon, there will be exclusive deals that prevent you from watching ANY baseball game unless you pay MLB money. It's disgusting and sad, but the way we are moving today. image
    I collect the elements on the periodic table, and some coins. I have a complete Roosevelt set, and am putting together a set of coins from 1880.
  • Carew29Carew29 Posts: 4,025 ✭✭

    Just wait until 2009 and you won't be able to watch TV unless it's a HD TV. Well since i won't be coughing up money to MLB anytime soon, i guess i can go back to the gym and re-join my softball leagues. This is really the last straw for me. You have to take a stand at some point in what you believe in.
  • Regarding COMCASt. it does BLOW. it blows Hard.

    basic cable prices have doubled in the past 6-7 years; do i have more content? yeah, 4 spanish channels, 3 portugese channels, several shopping channels.... all garbage. Really should be able to pick and choose what you want for a nominal fee. Down the road I can definitely see me dumping this rip off artists.
  • I've never heard outrage over the monopoly that DirecTV has with the NFL sunday ticket package...why the furor over baseball?

    I love DirecTV, infinitely better customer service than cable, better pricing, far fewer and less pricing increases, and I've never had an outage in 5 years of service.


    And why should any content be provided for free? It costs money to deliver that content over the internet...why should you get it for no charge? Just because you did in the past? If you don't want it, and don't want to pay for it, go back to the 'good ole days' and listen to it on a transistor radio.

    Technology costs money.
  • julen23julen23 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭
    i think somebody is on angel dust.

    julen
    image
    RIP GURU
  • mealewormmealeworm Posts: 1,271 ✭✭✭
    Do people still have cable??? Why put up with the BS? Directv is cheaper, better CS, picture, and selection.
    image
    1957 Topps 99% 7.40 GPA
    Hank Aaron Basic PSA 7-8(75%)
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,281 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I've never heard outrage over the monopoly that DirecTV has with the NFL sunday ticket package...why the furor over baseball?

    I love DirecTV, infinitely better customer service than cable, better pricing, far fewer and less pricing increases, and I've never had an outage in 5 years of service.


    And why should any content be provided for free? It costs money to deliver that content over the internet...why should you get it for no charge? Just because you did in the past? If you don't want it, and don't want to pay for it, go back to the 'good ole days' and listen to it on a transistor radio.

    Technology costs money. >>



    Hello Axtell

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,761 ✭✭✭✭✭
    << I've never heard outrage over the monopoly that DirecTV has with the NFL sunday ticket package...why the furor over baseball?

    I love DirecTV, infinitely better customer service than cable, better pricing, far fewer and less pricing increases, and I've never had an outage in 5 years of service.


    And why should any content be provided for free? It costs money to deliver that content over the internet...why should you get it for no charge? Just because you did in the past? If you don't want it, and don't want to pay for it, go back to the 'good ole days' and listen to it on a transistor radio.

    Technology costs money. >>



    Hello Axtell


    LOL, How many times will this clown keep coming back only to get banned again? It's beyond pathetic at this point.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • bri2327bri2327 Posts: 3,178 ✭✭


    << <i><< I've never heard outrage over the monopoly that DirecTV has with the NFL sunday ticket package...why the furor over baseball?

    I love DirecTV, infinitely better customer service than cable, better pricing, far fewer and less pricing increases, and I've never had an outage in 5 years of service.


    And why should any content be provided for free? It costs money to deliver that content over the internet...why should you get it for no charge? Just because you did in the past? If you don't want it, and don't want to pay for it, go back to the 'good ole days' and listen to it on a transistor radio.

    Technology costs money. >>



    Hello Axtell


    LOL, How many times will this clown keep coming back only to get banned again? It's beyond pathetic at this point. >>




    At this point I place the blame directly on PSA, not Axtell.

    They apparently had sufficient reason to boot him the first time...and the second time...and the third time. Among those reasons were more than likely violating PSA's policies in regards to profanity, harrassing other members, etc.

    If there was enough of a reason to remove him to begin with than it should be their obligation to enforce the ban more carefully and diligently for the good of the community.

    Their failure to uphold and enforce their rules and banishment of Ax is a let down and failure to look out for the best interest of the community members who abide by the rules and policies. By now they are just showing a total disregard for handling things properly.
    "The other teams could make trouble for us if they win."
    -- Yogi Berra

    image
  • cardbendercardbender Posts: 1,831 ✭✭
    I stopped following current Baseball action after the last strike.

    I could care less if Baseball went away for good. I only like the history of the game now. I've attended a few games over the past few years but they were all on free tickets. Baseball will never get another dime out of me.

    I'm Football only now and couldn't be happier.
  • estangestang Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭
    I have and like DirectTV. That said, I don't understand why MLB would make this business decision.
    Enjoy your collection!
    Erik
  • qmayerqmayer Posts: 286


    << <i>Really should be able to pick and choose what you want for a nominal fee. >>



    That will never happen because the way half of the garbage cable channels exist is because they are only available in packages with premium channels that everyone wants. For example, in order for a cable service to get something like an ESPN or Comedy Central, the cable provider would have to also get those 3 Portugese channels, 2 Spanish channels, and some other stuff no one would be interested in otherwise. (Yes, I know ESPN's situation is different, but use it as an example)

    Justin
    Currently collecting the Nolan Ryan Basic and Topps Player sets.

    NAXCOM
  • Has baseball done anything for the fan or for the good of the game since Bud Selig has been "commissioner" (aka owner lackey). I blame it on Selig and I can't tell you how much I hate that guy - he is destroying our national pastime. Remember, he did nothing, saw nothing, heard nothing while the steroid use was rampant. Only pressure from congress was finally able to get him off his a$$. He cares nothing about the game.
    << image >>
Sign In or Register to comment.