I notice the PSA numbers are quite a bit apart, could that be a contributing factor here (not that it should be)?
I do not have a ton of PSA material and the stuff I have tends to be newer, so my experience is pretty limited. Any of you more prolific PSA collectors have any insight as if you believe PSA grading has, on a whole, gotten stricter or looser over the years?
Anyone else have any side by side comparisons on par with these two? If so, I know I would love to see them.
i believe this is about as tremendous a disparity as you'll ever witness within that same psa grade! and, their respective final bids cannot be ignored... $1825 vs. $4151
I am assumng the one on the right has some type of surface wrinkle that does not show up on the scan? If not, it looks like it might be undergraded by a grade or two. Regardless, and with our without a wrinkle, it still looks tons better than the card on the left.
Comments
Bosox1976
I notice the PSA numbers are quite a bit apart, could that be a contributing factor here (not that it should be)?
I do not have a ton of PSA material and the stuff I have tends to be newer, so my experience is pretty limited. Any of you more prolific PSA collectors have any insight as if you believe PSA grading has, on a whole, gotten stricter or looser over the years?
Anyone else have any side by side comparisons on par with these two? If so, I know I would love to see them.
El Snorto~
and, their respective final bids cannot be ignored... $1825 vs. $4151
bring PSA penalties down upon thee and me.
Nick
Reap the whirlwind.
Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.