Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

ok ok misgrade of the year Mint 9 with paper loss

RipublicaninMassRipublicaninMass Posts: 10,051 ✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
this has to be a mistake, looks like paperloss, I thought it was a watermark on the image HA!
Edited: if this was a t205 it woulda been a 1
image

Comments

  • MorgothMorgoth Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭
    That is brutal. I agree it is a horrible misgrade and on a high end card no less. Here is one I found awhile back. It is only a four but no way it shouldn't geta qualifier.

    T206 Tinker with Writing on Back
    Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Unless you have the card in hand that could very well be an area where the ink is simply missing.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • storm888storm888 Posts: 11,701 ✭✭✭
    "Unless you have the card in hand that could very well be an area where the ink is simply missing."

    /////////////////////////////////////

    Yup.

    Could be a scuff or an errase, but I suspect it is not;
    because the "0" is just fine.
    Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.
  • Brian48Brian48 Posts: 2,624 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Unless you have the card in hand that could very well be an area where the ink is simply missing.


    Steve >>



    I was thinking the same thing. If it's missing ink, that qualifies as having a minor print defect according to the PSA 9 standard, correct?
Sign In or Register to comment.