Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Why no ST qualifier??

This is nothing on Levi, just the card itself. Why would this not get a ST qualifier. Or is that allowed for a grade of PSA 3??

image

Comments

  • I didn't think PSA put qualifiers on lower graded cards <4 or 5.
  • jeffcbayjeffcbay Posts: 8,950 ✭✭✭✭
    Actually, I don't think they put qualifiers on anything below a 7.
  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    Well, some qualifiers like MK, will go on any graded card, even a 1.

    I think MC you will sometimes see on low grade cards as well, when it is greater than 100/0
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    I once read here that the ST qualifier was for wax stained cards only, not cards stained by water or whatever. I could be wrong but that is what i was told.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • yawie99yawie99 Posts: 2,575 ✭✭✭
    That card's fine for a 3 NQ. At the lower end of the scale, the stated standards allow for the kind of flaws (e.g. stains) that will get an otherwise nicer card a qualifier. Besides the aforementioned MK, one doesn't see a lot of qualifiers on lower-grade cards..
    imageimageimageimageimageimage
  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭


    << <i>That card's fine for a 3 NQ. At the lower end of the scale, the stated standards allow for the kind of flaws (e.g. stains) that will get an otherwise nicer card a qualifier. Besides the aforementioned MK, one doesn't see a lot of qualifiers on lower-grade cards.. >>



    That is what I was wondering if it was part of the standards for lower graded cards.
Sign In or Register to comment.