a WOW submission (18 out of 18 PR70DC)

DennisH · February 28, 2007 4:36PM

someone has a GREAT eye for picking coins

Bochiman · February 28, 2007 4:38PM

Wow!

That is awesome! I see a new 2004 PR set in the registry coming up

bluespaceant · February 28, 2007 4:41PM

BECOKA · February 28, 2007 4:43PM

Shoot, I thought I did good when I got 70's on 15 of 20 $5 gold coins.

Whoever did that must have spent some quality time going through a few hundred proof sets. The Cent and the Silver Kennedy are really tough.

BECOKA · February 28, 2007 4:44PM

<< Is it possible this was a result from a bulk submission with a minimum grade of pr70? >>

No, the bulk department does not allow a minimum of 70. Also there is only 1 line item per denomination so they only submitted that many which falls way short of the Bulk requirements.

DennisH · February 28, 2007 4:49PM

I just noticed that the cert. numbers are not consecutive. What does that mean?

BECOKA · February 28, 2007 5:05PM

<< I just noticed that the cert. numbers are not consecutive. What does that mean? >>

My guess is that it was a regular or economy submission that had a minimum grade of 70. When the coins arrive the cert numbers are assigned to coins even if they don't meet the minimum grade.

Yale68 · February 28, 2007 8:28PM

No, it means that the coins were already in PCGS holders, and they were resubmitted for reholdering or for variety attribution

Louis · February 28, 2007 8:35PM

It was a submission from one of "the chosen people".

keets · February 28, 2007 8:44PM

i think it was probably a reholder or something and not a direct submission of raw coins.

STONE · February 28, 2007 9:08PM

HOLY S#$%. That's one awesome submission.

Can't do any better than that

cupronik · February 28, 2007 9:16PM

Maybe the coins are all regrades and the owner was hoping to make the first PR-71DC

Connecticoin · February 28, 2007 9:31PM

Probably a reholdering with the owner's pedigree.

pitboss · February 28, 2007 9:53PM

I thought I was the only one who thought that about the RED SOX and yankees.

DennisH · February 28, 2007 10:19PM

Pedigree... that's it! They all have the "Morgan T Smith Coll." pedigree.

jbsteven · February 28, 2007 10:29PM

if that was a regular submission the odds of that happening are just as high as winning the lottery.

CoinKing · February 28, 2007 11:00PM

No need to get excited folks...this was a reholder order.

COINB0Y · February 28, 2007 11:06PM

CarlWohlforth · February 28, 2007 11:22PM

I'd guess Ron is a reliable source of info.

I helped my friend package those coins for their journey to PCGS. He has been wanting to pedigree them for a long time.

seateddime · March 1, 2007 12:59AM

the grader had a good day!

BECOKA · March 1, 2007 1:59AM

<< Probably a reholdering with the owner's pedigree. >>

That sounds like the best answer.

Russ · March 1, 2007 2:09AM

Most of the cert numbers are dealer bulk, and this is obviously not a bulk submission.

Russ, NCNE

CarlWohlforth · March 1, 2007 2:11AM

<<<< Probably a reholdering with the owner's pedigree. >>

That sounds like the best answer. >>

Don't you guys read the other replies? CoinKing (Ron Guth, Pres. PCGS) says it was a reholder. I said I know the owner of the coins and he had them pedigreed. There is no probably about it.

notwilight · March 1, 2007 2:21AM

<< <<<< Probably a reholdering with the owner's pedigree. >> That sounds like the best answer. >> Don't you guys read the other replies? CoinKing (Ron Guth, Pres. PCGS) says it was a reholder. I said I know the owner of the coins and he had them pedigreed. There is no probably about it. >>

So I was wondering to myself on the ride to work this morning, thinking that he shared this order just to see the response here. Is he a forum member quietly smiling on the sidelines?

--jerry

BECOKA · March 1, 2007 2:24AM

<< <<<< Probably a reholdering with the owner's pedigree. >>

That sounds like the best answer. >>

Don't you guys read the other replies? CoinKing (Ron Guth, Pres. PCGS) says it was a reholder. I said I know the owner of the coins and he had them pedigreed. There is no probably about it. >>

Yep read it after I replied to a previous post. And yes you said that but after the probably statement which turned out to be true.

sadysta1 · March 1, 2007 2:43AM

great eye - not always, here's his other submission

linky

BlindedByEgo · March 1, 2007 2:55AM

<< No need to get excited folks...this was a reholder order. >>

Sure beats conspiracy theories

Type2 · March 1, 2007 2:57AM

Going to Auction soon and it pay's to be in a P.C.G.S holder.

Russ · March 1, 2007 2:58AM

<< great eye - not always, here's his other submission

linky >>

How do you know that submission belongs to the same person?

Russ, NCNE

Russ · March 1, 2007 2:59AM

<< Going to Auction soon and it pay's to be in a P.C.G.S holder. >>

The coins were already PCGS graded.

Russ, NCNE

Burks · March 1, 2007 4:08AM

<< great eye - not always, here's his other submission

linky >>

Whoa! A PR91!

BECOKA · March 1, 2007 4:36AM

<< 

<< great eye - not always, here's his other submission

linky >>

Whoa! A PR91! >>

Guess the transition to the 100 point grading scale has finally started. I love metric.

clackamas · March 1, 2007 4:47AM

So what do you think of this one. Link Fixed?

Russ · March 1, 2007 4:53AM

<< Order not found. >>

Russ, NCNE

TorinoCobra71 · March 1, 2007 4:55AM

DAMN! and to think of the hundreds of coins I have submitted to PCGS, I have only gotten ONE 70.....This is one LUCKY sucker.....

TorinoCobra71

a WOW submission (18 out of 18 PR70DC)

Comments

Leave a Comment