Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Weird 1913 S type 2 buffalo nickel

I can't pinpoint exactly why, but this coin looks completely FAKE to me:
Linky

Comments

  • claychaserclaychaser Posts: 4,406 ✭✭✭✭
    Cast copy?


    ==Looking for pre WW2 Commems in PCGS Rattler holders, 1851-O Three Cent Silvers in all grades



    Successful, problem free and pleasant transactions with: illini420, coinguy1, weather11am,wayneherndon,wondercoin,Topdollarpaid,Julian, bishdigg,seateddime, peicesofme,ajia,CoinRaritiesOnline,savoyspecial,Boom, TorinoCobra71, ModernCoinMart, WTCG, slinc, Patches, Gerard, pocketpiececommems, BigJohnD, RickMilauskas, mirabella, Smittys, LeeG, TomB, DeusExMachina, tydye
  • gyocomgdgyocomgd Posts: 2,582 ✭✭✭
    I have a feeling the coin is authentic but beset by myriad problems. It looks to be mildly corroded, for starters. Add a harsh cleaning on top of that, and this is what you get--a coin with no luster, just bright metal on the devices where it was cleaned. It's a bizarre-looking piece, and an unacceptable one.
    image
  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Genuine, I think-just corroded and cleaned as stated above.
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    I think it's genuine. You can see slight die clash on the reverse.

    Even so, I don't like the look of it.

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • pb2ypb2y Posts: 1,461
    The only thing abnormal is the price tag. I have a 1913 struck over a 1914--part of the 4 is visible.
    image

  • 66RB66RB Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭
    What's going on with the edge of the coin at 6:00 on the reverse?
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The only thing abnormal is the price tag. I have a 1913 struck over a 1914--part of the 4 is visible. >>


    Surely you jest. image

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • tincuptincup Posts: 5,389 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think it might be genuine also. But what I find strange...... I can believe the obverse, with it's softness. But then the reverse.... is very sharp. Looks out of place, and makes for a strange mismatched coin.
    ----- kj
  • icsoccericsoccer Posts: 1,339 ✭✭✭
    I agree that its probably original. It is a broken back variety. It does look odd with the obverse so dull and reverse ok.
    Successful BST transactions to date: Coindeuce, Cohodk, dantheman984, STONE, LeeG, jy8s, jkal, SeaEagleCoins, Hyperion, silverman68,Meltdown,RichieURich,savoyspecial,Barndog
  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,545 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The mintmark looks to be of the correct size and shape.

    I'd still have to check the rim on that puppy for tool marks before I dropped a cent.

    Pete
    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>It is a broken back variety. It does look odd with the obverse so dull and reverse ok. >>


    icsoccer - I'm thinking it's probably not quite a BB variety although close.

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file