Are auction catalogs a waste of paper?
The current style of auction catalogs is incredibly wasteful. Full page descriptions for pop top slop, quarter page photos of proof gold that looks the same at almost any size, etc. I understand that flat rate postage and cheap printing makes it relatively painless for the auctioneer to send out larger catalogs, but we're killing way too many trees for no clear benefit.
Does this bother you?
How much smaller do you think the catalogs could be without affecting the quality of the presentation?
I'd probably keep twice as many auction catalogs if they were half the size.
Does this bother you?
How much smaller do you think the catalogs could be without affecting the quality of the presentation?
I'd probably keep twice as many auction catalogs if they were half the size.
Andy Lustig
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
0
Comments
And what will you kill for lunch?
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>Does not bother me a bit. I have more important things to worry about..... like what I am going to have for lunch today.
And what will you kill for lunch? >>
I'm going to kill some free-roaming spaghetti
This is the end of an era. The catalogues are fun to have in hard copy but space as well as loss of resources is a concern. They are most useful when viewing auction lots and scribbling notes. They will disappear in the next few years as hard copy documentation disappears. Perminent archiving will be universally available and the last of the pre-computer generations die off. Notes will be easily added to virtual catalogues.
I can anticipate that google or some other source company will respond to a click with a picture, description, reserve, biding sequence and final price of all sold objects. For example , universal catalogues of all 1908 Matt Proof $2.5 coins in given grade sold in auctions will be available. You will be able to identify identical coins historically by the photo and view them by price grade (if changed), grading company. Sorting of all coins in a myriad of ways will be a snap. Grading services will also have pictoral source files of all coins graded by them.Transparency of the coin industry will improve despite continued efforts to obfuscate.
Obviously all collections will have a pictoral equivalent. I suppose the next question is why have objects at all; will all possesions be digitalized?
<< <i>Does not bother me a bit. I have more important things to worry about..... like what I am going to have for lunch today.
And what will you kill for lunch? >>
Not sure. Knowing me, it will be something that will give me heart burn, clog my arteries, and help inflate my spare tire more. It all depends if my wife is around or not. He she is hovering over me, I will be stuck eating some kind of yicky yogurt with a side of bean sprouts again. Actually if she is around, she would probably make me eat all the coin catalogs she can find.
I think they will always be around, for floor bidders if nothing else. But at some point competition has to kick in and it is not going to be competitve for the auction houses to continually mail phone books out to their whole client base. Expect distribution to really fall once we all have mobile devices with good screens and ubiquitous wireless Internet service - we should be pretty much there in about five years.
I can already take a phone and surf the auction site, but the user experience isn't quite what it needs to be to get rid of the auction catalog - I need faster more reliable Internet service and a bigger screen on the device. It will happen.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
More than any electronic format created to date, with a catalogue I can sit down and browse, getting a sense of the overall scope of a sale, the strengths and weaknesses, a sense of quality, items I may be interested in that are in my collecting area, items I might be interested in but would overlook because they are outside my typical collecting areas . . .
Some of my favorite catalogues have been ones that might be technically inefficient (at least as measured by pages per coin, perhaps less inefficient in terms of value per page) such as Stack's catalogues of the Taichert collection or the coins of "Mr. 1796" Some of their darkside catalgues, and catalogues of colonial coins have been packed with information -- the historical value of these presentations would seem to more than justify the cost.
I sell auction catalogs and am in the process of listing a whole inventory at www.earlymint.com Click on the link below if this one does not work. There is really no comparison to using a catalog compared to internet or cd viewing in my opinion. Not only are they historical but when a collector buys a valuable coin from an auction he often wants the catalog to go with the coin. The catalogs are also valuable in research and reference. I have traced some coins clear back to collections held in the 1800's.
On the other hand calalogs should open the average collector's eyes to the amount of material available in any given issue. It definitely is an eye opener to see how vast some collections are or were and the amount of money involved in building these collections. It makes my few paltry coins seem insignificant. Like a small fish in a big ocean. But it's better to know than not. These catalogs will certainly cause some to change strategy in their collecting habits.
And lastly, more than one collector has decided it is cheaper to cut out pictures of coins to build a collection than buy the coin.
And for all the people who just throw yours away, if you have Goldbergs Pre-Long Beach catalogue from a couple weeks ago I'd be happy to take it off of your hands for you.
Mark
<< <i>we're killing way too many trees for no clear benefit. >>
I like catalogs; I say use recycled material when possible, but kill the trees when needed & plant more.
That, and something of a tribute to the catalogers knowledge and expertise, sort of like a college professor who thinks he is on the cutting edge when the only ones who buy his book are the students in his class who have to buy the book.
Before long, anyone with a passing interest will be able to catalog the history and pedigree of 95% of what is auctioned today.
Coin's for sale/trade.
Tom Pilitowski
US Rare Coin Investments
800-624-1870
think that the online catalogs could be much improved. The problem that I have with online listings is that they don't have decent thumbnail images of the coins. I don't want to have to open every lot to figure out what I like and don't like. I want to be able to scan a large number of coins and figure out which ones interest me quickly.
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
The catalogue concept is valuable to me in that I can browse thru it, at my leisure and identify items of interest. I could certainly then look up the items on a website if I wanted to have a more in depth presentation.
There would be no need for full page write ups, but there could be some photographs, and a way to point out significant items. Browsers, like myself, will certainly have to read these catalogues much better than they may do now to make sure that they do not miss something of serious interest.
Heritage does something like that with their on-line sessions that they run with the signature sales. They currently offer lesser value items, but if they had a similar catalogue for the floor auctions, I believe that there could be savings in at least paper, ink, and even postage.
I firmly believe in numismatics as the world's greatest hobby, but recognize that this is a luxury and without collectors, we can all spend/melt our collections/inventories.
eBaystore
I enjoy them better than the newspaper.
Just a last note. Some collectors are old school, and dont have the time or even patience (or maybe even a computer) to be going on-line for checking coins out. Catalogs are much easier.
They will make them smaller when the inevitable happens: Sales slow down, or fewer coins offered for sale.
of FE & IH Cents, Heritage FUN 2003. It's the thinest catalog you've ever seen, more like a thick brochure.
That is the type of catalog auction houses should center on these days. Put the rest on their website
and in downloadable PDF files. That way we can pick and choose how much paper we waste.
I've thrown out at least a thousand pounds of auction catalogs over the past 6 years. Most of them filled
with nothing I'm interested in. Tossed into the newspaper recyclables, but 50 times as dense.
My 1866 Philly Mint Set
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Yea, verily.
When I take my time to leaf through paper catalogs I tend to bid on more coins. If I run a search online I am much less likely to bid on a random coin because it won't show up in my search results. In addition to the great information catalog(ue)s give, they also whet my appetite and serve as a sales brochure to get me "under the ether."
Obscurum per obscurius
Collecting:
Conder tokens
19th & 20th Century coins from Great Britain and the Realm
Until that changes, they're here to stay!
<< <i>I'm about to give a LOT of them the heave ho! >>
I'm in the process of doing some house cleaning and will be keeping only the ones that I think are of some importance.
They're just taking up way tooo much shelf space.
<< <i>I can't count the number of times I've searched an auction electronically and then decided to bid on something else once I got the paper catalog in hand and went through it thoroughly. >>
I agree!!
I always seem to miss something on-line but spot it in the catalogue.
Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"
It's interesting that most of the tree huggers live in large cities where all the habitat has been destroyed for both animals and plants - not sure why that is. Perhaps it's because they feel the loss most intensly?? Or the guilt?
Lakesammman - Tree huggers like me, from NY, appreciate the Pacific Northwest. It's one of the most beautiful areas of this country.
Lets keep it that way. Would you agree that the clearcutting of trees in your state is a problem?
I'm one of the biggest tree huggers - former forestry major.
How you cut the trees is really immaterial. It's the fact that we have (a) too many people in the world and (b) most are consuming more than they should is the heart of the issue.