Have you tried your hand at grading the Prez Dollars?

I just went through a couple of rolls, and I keep losing sight of my criteria. I don't know if I am being distracted by all of the nicks and dings, the design itself, or whether they are just too unfamiliar at this point.
I just wanted to see if any good specimens could be found in these first rolls from the Fed, and it sure doesn't look very promising. Maybe an MS-63, or maybe my eyeballs are confused? What are your grading criteria for these things?
I just wanted to see if any good specimens could be found in these first rolls from the Fed, and it sure doesn't look very promising. Maybe an MS-63, or maybe my eyeballs are confused? What are your grading criteria for these things?
Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally
I knew it would happen.
I knew it would happen.
0
Comments
Steve
Of the couple rolls none that I think would make 66 or higher.
So far none that I would pay somebody to put into plastic but they do buy the daily coffee and dounuts. No jelly that is for Bear.
And I have not found any of the Godless ones.
Will try another roll next week and keep hoping for the lucky one.
1. Obv./Rev. fields
2. Obv. face/nose/forehead
3. Rev. arm/face/$1
4. Strike- most are strong thus far
5. Rim - obv./rev.
6. eye appearance/luster
In my book a:
MS67: Will have zero noticable marks or serious chatter in 1-3. Strong luster, superior eye appeal.
MS66: Marks/tics evident but not serious or in primary focal area. Fields nearly perfect. Attractive eye appeal.
MS65: Marks evident in fields and PFA but still not serious or unattractive.
MS64: Attractive eye appeal but serious chatter. No digs or gouges/scratches.
MS63: Nice luster but impaired fields and devices. Many hits/tics. Your avg. coin.
What I've found/submitted:
67's: Maybe 1 or 2. Probably not.
66's: 6-10
65's: 20-25
64's: I don't do 64's!!