Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

Another hole filled

Another gap in my collection filled

image

Comments

  • HussuloHussulo Posts: 2,953 ✭✭✭
    Is it an obverse 2 + reverse C?
  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,737 ✭✭✭✭✭


  • << <i>Is it an obverse 2 + reverse C? >>



    Good question. A 1954 penny according to Freeman is 2+C but his discription of a reverse C is in variance with the picture he has of the 1954. Mine is definitely not a B as the right hand strike of the N for a B is to a bead whereas mine is to a gap. Freeman discribes the C as the same as B but with a larger brittannia, so it should also have the N to bead but the picture shows it to gap as with mine. So is mine a D, well no as the 9 on the D is lower than the other numerals. Mine is high and level with the appearance of the picture of Freemans C.
  • I have just realised that I have now completed my birth year, excluding Gold as I don't collect Gold.
    That is:

    Half crown
    Two Shilling
    Shilling English
    Shilling Scottish
    Six pence
    Brass three pence
    Penny
    Half penny 3+A
    Half penny 3+B
    Farthing
    Maundy penny to four penny
  • Here is mine an obvious altered date... as yours probably is....


    image

    image



    If yours is genuine it is worth a substantial amount... Unlikely though...... Only one known specimen.....
  • The genuine specimen is imaged on Tony Clayton's website.....


    Tony Clayton's website.... Scroll down to find the 1954

    image

    image


  • << <i>Here is mine an obvious altered date... as yours probably is....


    image

    image



    If yours is genuine it is worth a substantial amount... Unlikely though...... Only one known specimen..... >>



    I assume mine's an altered 1964, yours is a much better condition than mine but I think my 5 is done better. I much prefer these to the copies you find. Just need a 1933 and 1952. I missed a 33 although the 3 wasn't too well done.


  • << <i>I assume mine's an altered 1964, yours is a much better condition than mine but I think my 5 is done better. I much prefer these to the copies you find. Just need a 1933 and 1952. I missed a 33 although the 3 wasn't too well done. >>



    I agree... I had to look twice at the 5 on yours... a very nice job....

    my 1933 altered date is not the greatest.... and the only 1952 I have is a struck copy........
  • wybritwybrit Posts: 6,972 ✭✭✭
    Some not bad fakes there.
    Former owner, Cambridge Gate collection.


  • << <i>Some not bad fakes there. >>



    I think mine suffered a bit in the process, I think I need to improve the tone a bit, it's a bit pink from the heating. I'm not sure how I can go about this though. It would be interesting to know how one goes about adjusting a coin in this way to change the day as I'm sure it cant be easy.
  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,577 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hmm, you need to ask the Indian Head Cent doctors as they have stripping and cleaning and retoning down to an art.

    Hey, you could silver plate the coin and call it a day!
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
Sign In or Register to comment.