Poll: Should Sportflics Be in Basic Sets?
MeteoriteGuy
Posts: 7,140 ✭✭
Pretty simple question, should Sportflics Be in Basic Sets?
Clear Skies,
Mark
Clear Skies,
Mark
Collecting PSA graded Steve Young, Marcus Allen, Bret Saberhagen and 1980s Topps Cards.
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
0
Comments
Joe
<< <i>Absolutely. They were nationally distributed, had comprehensive checklists, and were officially licensed. They're every bit as valid of basic, mainstream sets as Topps sets are.
>>
Agreed
Nick
Reap the whirlwind.
Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
Mark Mulder rookies
Chipper Jones rookies
Orlando Cabrera rookies
Lawrence Taylor
Sam Huff
Lavar Arrington
NY Giants
NY Yankees
NJ Nets
NJ Devils
1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
Looking for Topps rookies as well.
References:
GregM13
VintageJeff
Steve
<< <i>No way. When a player has 85 cards in their basic set, as George Brett does, how can that be considered basic? That's convoluted, diluted, and complicated. Nothing basic about it. A basic set is one card per year, in Brett's case it would be the run of topps cards from 75-93. Donruss, fleer, flair, Studio, sportsflic and all other junk should be in the master set. >>
I'm a Topps collector and I think you have no idea what you're talking about. George Brett had a career that spanned 3 DECADES. 85 Cards is not some crazy out of this world number. A basic set is far from one card a year, that's a basic collection.
Mark Mulder rookies
Chipper Jones rookies
Orlando Cabrera rookies
Lawrence Taylor
Sam Huff
Lavar Arrington
NY Giants
NY Yankees
NJ Nets
NJ Devils
1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
Looking for Topps rookies as well.
References:
GregM13
VintageJeff
You would think a person could have an opinion here without being told they don't know what they're talking about.
The only cards I have a problem with being added to either the basic or master sets are those that are serial numbered 1/5 or what have you that would eliminate the possibility of all people interested in completing the set to do so and cards that dont depict the player specifically, such as team cards or the like.
-- Yogi Berra
Yes, they are regional. Why they include some odd ball cards in basic sets is beyond me.
However, perhaps if PSA is looking they see that we think Sportflics are regular sportcards appropriate for regular basic sets. (Which of course they are.)
I forgot about that Bonds card. Good question.
Mark
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
Kirk
<< <i>Kind of a side note on this thread, what year of sportflics did you like the best and why. Never really collected them though I do have the 94 sportflic rookie and traded set. I like when they started using one continual picture, i.e. like a person swinging the bat, on the cards, instead of the 3 different poses, like the headshot, batting and fielding on the card image.
Kirk >>
Personally I like the 86-87's the best. A ton of stars, some nice rookies as well. For a long time I didn't see them until maybe around 1996 again, and by then they weren't what they once were to me.
Mark Mulder rookies
Chipper Jones rookies
Orlando Cabrera rookies
Lawrence Taylor
Sam Huff
Lavar Arrington
NY Giants
NY Yankees
NJ Nets
NJ Devils
1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
Looking for Topps rookies as well.
References:
GregM13
VintageJeff
Mark
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
and this one..
You know the 1996 artists proof version of the sportsflix cards were limited to only 500 made!! For 1996 that is Really low.
Clear Skies,
Mark Bostick
www.meteoritearticles.com
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.