Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Buying back or is it still shilling?

A friend of mine presented this to me and I wanted to get your opinions on this. Lately, he's been selling on ebay and starts everything within the .99 - 9.99 range. As the days progress towards his 7th day ....let's say he has 5 hours left; he would then put some of his own items into his snipe. He has a separate account for buying. He insists that this isn't shilling, but mainly to protect his investment. He has won some of his own items at the last second. Both accounts have the same name and address and everything; so if Ebay was to check it out, they would see it's the same person and he said he has nothing to hide. He says there is no shilling presented within the 7 day duration ahead of time. Although I do see his point; is this a good idea?

Comments

  • Brian48Brian48 Posts: 2,624 ✭✭✭
    Unethical as hell and no better than shilling if you ask me.
  • GriffinsGriffins Posts: 6,076 ✭✭✭
    Flat out shilling, and he'll get tossed off ebay if they find out.
    If he's worried about "protecting his investment" he should use a reserve or sell at fixed price.

    Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's

  • lawnmowermanlawnmowerman Posts: 19,477 ✭✭✭✭
    The reason I would say it is wrong is;

    what if someone else snipes his auction with a huge price after he put his own snipe in? It becomes flat out, blatant shilling.
  • imageimageimage
    succesful deals :richtree, Bosox1976, Bkritz, mknez, SOM, cardcounter2, ddfamf, cougar701, mrG, Griffins : thanks All

    Go Phillies
  • cohocorpcohocorp Posts: 1,371 ✭✭
    shilling. no question. very unethical.
  • Shill Bidding

    Shill Bidding is bidding that artificially increases an item’s price or apparent desirability, or bidding by individuals with a level of access to the seller’s item information not available to the general Community. Shill Bidding is prohibited on eBay.

    Because family members, roommates and employees of sellers have a level of access to item information which is not available to the general Community, they are not permitted to bid on items offered by the seller – even if their sole intent is to purchase the item. Family members, roommates or employees may purchase items from a seller without violating this policy simply by using purchase options – such as Buy It Now – which do not involve bidding.

    eBay strongly encourages sellers with employees to ensure that their employees are aware of this policy and the possible consequences of violation.

    Violations of this policy may result in a range of actions, including:

    Listing cancellation

    Limits on account privileges

    Account suspension

    Forfeit of eBay fees on cancelled listings

    Loss of PowerSeller status

    Referral to Law Enforcement

    Spend a few minutes taking eBay's tutorial on Shill bidding.

    If you believe that another member is artificially raising the price or desirability of an item by shill bidding please report it to eBay. Please be sure to provide the user IDs and the item numbers in question.

  • that's an easy one - 100% wrong


  • The only way he has gotten away with this shilling... is because no one has reported him to eBay.

    It will catch up with him.

  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    when ebay first started sellers could do what he is doing. they stopped that practice and it is considered shilling. like mentioned he should pay the extra .20 cents and start the items higher. or do a reserve type auction.

    does he pay the final value fees? or does he claim the buyer and 'he' have decided not to finish the sale?

    anyway you look at it it is a slimy practice.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Both accounts have the same name

    That is impossible, or I am missing something.

    Did you mean both accounts are registered in the same name?

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • Shill bidding is against eBay rules and is illegal under the 2006 Fraud Act.

    It's also against the law and some people have ended up in court.

    More reading on Shill Bidding
  • A friend of mine presented this to me and I wanted to get your opinions on this. Lately, he's been selling on ebay and starts everything within the .99 - 9.99 range. As the days progress towards his 7th day ....let's say he has 5 hours left; he would then put some of his own items into his snipe. He has a separate account for buying. He insists that this isn't shilling, but mainly to protect his investment. He has won some of his own items at the last second. Both accounts have the same name and address and everything; so if Ebay was to check it out, they would see it's the same person and he said he has nothing to hide. He says there is no shilling presented within the 7 day duration ahead of time. Although I do see his point; is this a good idea?

    The old " A friend of mine " story lol image

    Im sure it's just a friend of yours but like the others said it's not right

    Dave
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,438 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not nice.

    mike
    Mike
  • does he pay the final value fees? or does he claim the buyer and 'he' have decided not to finish the sale?

    He does pay for the final value fee.

    I agree with everyone's answer.
  • Auction houses do it.




  • << <i>Auction houses do it. >>



    I can believe it!
  • storm888storm888 Posts: 11,701 ✭✭✭
    Violates EBAY's TOS.

    If caught, the person will be NARUd fast.

    Use a reserve, or start the auction at a price that
    is satisfactory as the final sale price. Or, use BIN.
    Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.


  • << <i>Auction houses do it. >>



    They do and it still doesn't make it alright.

    Say NO to shill bidding.

    I too have a tightwad friend that occasionaly will email me and
    ask me to pump up his 99 cent auctions to like $5. I just delete his
    emails and ignore him. He's just a tightwad that's trying to save himself the extra 20 cents it costs to start listings at the 40 cent level as oppsoed to the starting point of 99 cents which cost 20 cents to run. It's just petty.
  • The responsible thing for you to do would report him. The rest of us pay the fees to start an auction higher not to lose our investment. Your friend needs to be reported. If you are not going to report him, give us his ID so we do not bid on his auctions.
  • yikes, I hope I haven't bought anything from him.
  • BoopottsBoopotts Posts: 6,784 ✭✭
    I don't get it-- isn't bidding on your own stuff the very definition of shill bidding? I mean, just where is the grey area here?
  • It's technically not a shill if he actually wins his own auction since nobody is out any money other than the seller but still unethical as already stated. Many years ago sellers were allowed one bid on their own items. The primary reason for this was in case there was an error in listing the start price. This was abused both as a shilling method and as fee avoidance. Of the 10,000 or so listings I've done over the years I bought a card back once and still feel like an idiot for doing so. It is not worth wasting a good reputation over a couple ten dollar bills. Pay the extra 50 cents or whatever the fee may be and start the item out at the minimum sell price. If it doesn't sell the first time it can be relisted without charge provided it sells the next go-round.
    "One you start thinking you're the best then you might as well quit because you wont get any better" - Dale Earnhardt
  • GriffinsGriffins Posts: 6,076 ✭✭✭
    It technically is a shill if the seller bids on his own auction. There is no grey area here, and ebay would certainly agree.You put something up for auction without a reserve, it should sell to the highest bidder, and that bidder or the bidder than ran him up cannot be the owner of the item- whether or not the owner is the seller, or the consignor.

    Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's

  • It's technically not a shill if he actually wins his own auction since nobody is out any money other than the seller but still unethical as already stated.


    So if I have a bid on one of his items and he out bids me and wins. You stated it's not shill????

    Wrong!

    It's shilling!
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,757 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Unethical as hell and no better than shilling if you ask me.

    I agree 100%. Your friend is no better than any other scammer out there.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • A shill is an associate of a person selling goods or services who pretends no association to the seller and assumes the air of an enthusiastic customer. The intention of the shill is, using crowd psychology, to encourage other potential customers unaware of the set-up to purchase said goods or services. Shills are often employed by confidence artists.

    The word "shill" is probably related to "shillaber", a word of obscure early-20th century origin with the same meaning.

    Shilling is illegal in many circumstances and in many jurisdictions because of the frequently fraudulent and damaging character of their actions. However, if a shill does not place uninformed parties at a risk of loss, but merely generates “buzz,” the shill's actions may be legal. For example, a person planted in an audience to laugh and applaud when appropriate, see "claque", or to participate in on-stage activities as a "random member of the audience", is a type of legal shill.

    A common shilling tactic is to have two shills. The first is a young child (or some other sympathetic character) who offers a low bid for a moderately-priced item. Other auction participants will be reluctant to outbid him. The second shill is an ill-mannered and usually overweight man who does just that—he outbids the kid, who starts crying. In theory, this should provoke other auction participants to outbid the man solely for the sake of beating him; by bidding well beyond the item's value, he can artificially increase prices.

    This practice is illegal in virtually all jurisdictions

  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,757 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Flat out shilling, and he'll get tossed off ebay if they find out.
    If he's worried about "protecting his investment" he should use a reserve or sell at fixed price.


    Absolutely. And what happens if his "snipe" doesn't win the auction but just bumps up the high bidder? Does he expect full payment or sell at the "before snipe" price? I'm sure he sends the invoice with nary a word and that is dishonest and stealing.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • storm888storm888 Posts: 11,701 ✭✭✭
    "...dishonest and stealing. "

    /////////////////////////////////

    Yup.
    Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.


  • << <i>It's technically not a shill if he actually wins his own auction since nobody is out any money other than the seller but still unethical as already stated.


    So if I have a bid on one of his items and he out bids me and wins. You stated it's not shill????

    Wrong!

    It's shilling! >>



    I've always viewed shilling as a prictice that costs others money but we're splitting hairs here. We all agree the practice described in the original post is clearly unethical. It is the equivalent of having an item end at a given price then refusing to sell the item to the highest bidder. It destoys the integrity of the seller and auction house. That said, I'll take a non-performing seller over a card trimmer or liberal grader any day of the week. The latter costs me actual money. I only lose potential gains with the former.
    "One you start thinking you're the best then you might as well quit because you wont get any better" - Dale Earnhardt
  • The final value fees you claim he is paying is probably costing him a lot more than it would be to just list the item with a higher starting bid. Seems pretty dumb to me and of course, just wrong.
  • First, let me start by saying I have never shilled my own auctions.

    Now, I don't think protecting your investment is wrong. Just because it is in an auction doesn't mean you HAVE to sell it. Contract law states that it isn't until the auction closes that a sale takes place. I am sure everyone of us has sold something for a price where we would have willingly and happily bought it back for that price. And what is wrong with that. Just because you are the seller doesn't mean you can't also be a buyer. Plus who says it is wrong, ebay? Like they are ethical. Who came up with the term shill bidding anyways? Just because ebay says it is wrong doesn't mean it actually is.

    It is YOUR item to sell, not ebay's. Shouldn't YOU decide at what price you want to sell it.


  • << <i>It is YOUR item to sell, not ebay's. Shouldn't YOU decide at what price you want to sell it >>



    That is why they have the "Reserve" feature.
    image

    My daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 2 (2003). My son was diagnosed with Type 1 when he was 17 on December 31, 2009. We were stunned that another child of ours had been diagnosed. Please, if you don't have a favorite charity, consider giving to the JDRF (Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation)

    JDRF Donation
  • It's technically not a shill if he actually wins his own auction since nobody is out any money other than the seller but still unethical as already stated

    You can't be that naive right?? If he bumps his own card and sells it....the other high bidder was robbed..straight up!!
    If he bids on his own card and wins it....IF there was ANY bid on that card lower than his....the other bidder was also robbed..straight up!!

    If he starts an auction at 99 cents...he is leagally obligated to sell it for 99 cents if it gets a bid!! No arguments....
    If I bid $1.50 on it and it's a $20 card...and would have been the high bidder...if he bumped it any higher and won it back himself....then he robbed me

    Either side of the coin he's screwing everyone!


    I've always viewed shilling as a prictice that costs others money but we're splitting hairs here.

    You're correct.....again...if he makes more by bumping his own cards...the buyer pays more. If someone doesn't get the card that he won back...they are out a potential gain..

    Shilling costs EVERYONE
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,757 ✭✭✭✭✭
    First, let me start by saying I have never shilled my own auctions.

    Now, I don't think protecting your investment is wrong. Just because it is in an auction doesn't mean you HAVE to sell it. Contract law states that it isn't until the auction closes that a sale takes place. I am sure everyone of us has sold something for a price where we would have willingly and happily bought it back for that price. And what is wrong with that. Just because you are the seller doesn't mean you can't also be a buyer. Plus who says it is wrong, ebay? Like they are ethical. Who came up with the term shill bidding anyways? Just because ebay says it is wrong doesn't mean it actually is.

    It is YOUR item to sell, not ebay's. Shouldn't YOU decide at what price you want to sell it.


    If the sellers wants to "protect" his investment, he should start the item off at a price he's comfortable accepting or put a reserve on it. To list an item and call it a "no reserve" auction with the intention of sniping the auction at the very end of the listing to to either a) win back the item or b) drive the price up so the high bidder gets screwed is flat out wrong and stealing. I don't know why this concept is so difficult to comprehend for some people.

    Edit: Here's another novel thought: If the auction price is not at the level the seller is willing to accept, then why not just cancel all bids and cancel the auction before its conclusion? You know why, because the "sniper" is not hoping he wins the auction with his snipe, he's just hoping to steal money from the high bidder by driving the price up dishonestly.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Grote I think some here are playing stupid. Everyone knows it is wrong.


    steve
    Good for you.
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,757 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Grote I think some here are playing stupid. Everyone knows it is wrong.


    steve


    I'd like to think you're right steve, but I'm not so sure.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i> Grote I think some here are playing stupid. Everyone knows it is wrong.


    steve


    I'd like to think you're right steve, but I'm not so sure. >>



    Unfortunately, image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • storm888storm888 Posts: 11,701 ✭✭✭
    The practice described also skews the FB system.

    The seller/buyer leave FB for each other. In this case,
    both seller/buyer are the same person.
    Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.
  • NickMNickM Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭
    Remember how eBay insists that their software catches shilling and that we shouldn't worry that they have now made bidders invisible on items over a certain price?

    Time for the Animal House cough.

    Nick
    image
    Reap the whirlwind.

    Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
Sign In or Register to comment.