So, Heritage, which is it?

Oldnewbie · January 30, 2007 1:12PM

Coxe · January 30, 2007 1:18PM

Folks bidding on them should know. If not, the pops do kind of paint the picture. Good attention to their write-ups.

DieClash · January 30, 2007 1:59PM

<< El one O

El two O >>

El one O has the mint mark below the bow

El two O has the mint mark above the bow

So the pop grid is correct.

<< 1875-CC 10C Mintmark Above Bow MS65 PCGS. The Above Bow variety is slightly more elusive than its Below Bow counterpart. Th... >>

So you think they've got the pop reports on the wrong coin?

Coxe · January 30, 2007 2:59PM

<< 

<< El one O

El two O >>

El one O has the mint mark below the bow

El two O has the mint mark above the bow

So the pop grid is correct.

<< 1875-CC 10C Mintmark Above Bow MS65 PCGS. The Above Bow variety is slightly more elusive than its Below Bow counterpart. Th... >>

So you think they've got the pop reports on the wrong coin? >>

1875-CC 10C Mintmark Below Bow MS65 NGC. A much tougher variety than the Mintmark Within Bow variant.

Get it now?

DieClash · January 30, 2007 3:11PM

<< 

1875-CC 10C Mintmark Below Bow MS65 NGC. A much tougher variety than the Mintmark Within Bow variant.

Get it now? >>

yeah, that's why I edited my post. I didn't catch that the first time. Thanks.

Coxe · January 30, 2007 3:19PM

I think the cataloguer probably just meant it the other way around in the wrong description. It happens. However, the slightly descriptor is a slight understatement I think.

DieClash · January 30, 2007 3:40PM

<< I think the cataloguer probably just meant it the other way around in the wrong description. It happens. However, the slightly descriptor is a slight understatement I think. >>

Good catch!

So, Heritage, which is it?

Comments

Leave a Comment